• sebinspace
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9210 months ago

    LLMs are essentially confident-sounding lying machines with a penchant to occasionally disclose private data or plagiarise existing work. While they do this, they also use vast amounts of energy

    Just described most people

    • @SkyNTP@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2610 months ago

      Coincidentally, also why I don’t care much for most social media content.

        • @Draupnir@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1310 months ago

          Well I don’t know about you, but my mind goes to user-written instagram posts, Facebook posts, and tweets. You know, things like local moms groups circlejerking about toxins in foods etc etc

          • @GiveMemes@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I think that’s just for a different sort of person. While there is some relatively high level discussion on lemmy we also like to circlejerk just about other things. Different strokes for different folks. The two services aren’t that different besides Lemmy being foss

    • dantheclammanOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      6310 months ago

      Edge is branding itself “The AI Browser”. Chrome has plans to embed LLMs for text input. Opera, the browser which was commandeered from the original Vivaldi team and turned into a crypto/VPN gimmick browser, is of course among the hardest leaning into the LLM trend.

    • Ephera
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5810 months ago

      Webpage authors use LLMs to generate extremely long articles, to make you scroll by ads for longer. You use LLMs in your browser to summarize those articles. The circle of life, or something.

      • @akrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        910 months ago

        I stumbled upon a website through DDG, and after a long intro, the main section supposedly where the thing I was searching for had “Sorry I can’t fulfill your request right now”. Basically a fully generated page to match my search with some parasitic seo tactics. The web be chaging. Front page of DDG.

        • @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          410 months ago

          Reminds me of the amazon products titled: “I’m sorry but I cannot fulfill this request it goes against OpenAI use policy,”.

          I think we’re way beyond the point of no return. The internet has been ruined for good.

    • @Byter@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1810 months ago

      I’d love a browser-embedded LLM that had access to the DOM.

      “Highlight all passages that talk about yadda yadda. Remove all other content. Convert the dates to the ISO standard. Put them on a number line chart, labeled by blah.”

      That’d be great UX.

      • @JoeyJoeJoeJr@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1010 months ago

        You are falling into a common trap. LLMs do not have understanding - asking it to do things like convert dates and put them on a number line may yield correct results sometimes, but since the LLM does not understand what it’s doing, it may “hallucinate” dates that look correct, but don’t actually align with the source.

        • @Byter@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          110 months ago

          Thank you for calling that out. I’m well aware, but appreciate your cautioning.

          I’ve seen hallucinations from LLMs at home and at work (where I’ve literally had them transcribe dates like this). They’re still absolutely worth it for their ability to handle unstructured data and the speed of iteration you get – whether they “understand” the task or not.

          I know to check my (its) work when it matters, and I can add guard rails and selectively make parts of the process more robust later if need be.

      • @daed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        That’s actually fascinating to think about. Would be a fun project to mash something like Blazor Server and an LLM together and allow users to just kindly ask to rewrite the DOM in plain English.

      • body_by_make
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 months ago

        Arc has an LLM that lets you replace your search functionality with search or ask, where if you type a question it tries to answer it based on the content on the page. Kinda close to what you’re talking about.

        Arc is genuinely trying to use LLMs in their browser in interesting ways.

        • Goku
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 months ago

          Hmm maybe this is why Firefox is so damn slow on my raspberry pi

          • AlmightySnoo 🐢🇮🇱🇺🇦
            link
            fedilink
            English
            8
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Hmm I don’t think it’s because of that feature, because it only runs when you explicitly ask it to translate a page for you. You should probably check your extensions, see if you have some redundant ones (a mistake people make is use multiple ad-blockers/anti-trackers, when just uBlock Origin + Firefox’s defaults are usually good enough).

      • Ephera
        link
        fedilink
        English
        710 months ago

        Firefox has that already (without using an LLM). But yeah, it’s still another way this could be implemented or possibly improved.

      • Shurimal
        link
        fedilink
        110 months ago

        Vivaldi has had local translation for about half a year now. No need for LLM for this feature.

    • @LibreFish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 months ago

      Quick tool to summarize a page, proofread, or compare it to another source. Still needs a functioning human brain to separate the wheat from the chaff so to speak, but I could see a LLM (especially local) being useful in some ways.

      I’m sure there are disabilities or unique use cases that could increase it’s usefulness, especially once they improve more.

    • sab
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Same. Which is to say I have it installed and boot it along with GNOME Web every time I need to check that my shitty web programming work outside of Gecko. Which is thankfully rare.

      Vivaldi is nice though.

  • BargsimBoyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    110 months ago

    Basically, there’s no commercial benefit at this stage.

    Once there is benefit they will add it in.

    Whole lot of article for nothing.

      • BargsimBoyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        610 months ago

        Yeah they did, but with some nice words around it all.

        Did you read the article? It’s literally that llms are not at a stage where they’re useful. And then they end that once they become useful they’ll look at adding them in.

        And Vivaldi is a business like any other, so it’s ultimately commercially driven. If you think they’re just running the business for the sake of being good then you’re incredibly naive.

          • BargsimBoyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Lol. People are way too tribalistic about their favourite products.

            I’m not even saying anything negative - adding AI to your product is not a big deal, and they’ll do it when it makes sense to. Not sure why you have an issue with that/don’t understand that’s their intent as it’s very clearly stated by them.

            Literally here you go: "Despite all this, we feel that the field on machine learning in general remains an exciting one and may lead to features that are actually useful. In the future, we hope that it will allow us to bring good privacy-respecting features to our users with a focus on improving discoverability and accesibility. "

  • Martin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    010 months ago

    Kind of ironic how they use an AI generated article image