• Queue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      502 years ago

      I think YouTubers make fractional pennies from Ads, and mostly only if its fully watched and sometimes clicked to go to the website. So if you get a 15 second ad, and skip to the content, you didn’t give the creators any money.

      Also, shout out to those ads being horrible. My first time ever installing an adblocker was during a rapid anti-smoking campaign, that had body horror. 15 year old me didn’t want to smoke, nor wanted to after, but it was so disturbing that I learned how to avoid them.

      Not even going into the disturbing or weird ads. One time I got an ad for a “Ching Chong Fing Fong shirt company” as a way of mocking Chinese people because their government sucks. Another time, I got a full 12 hour video by a Vietnamese couple just grilling in their backyard. No subtitles, not even sure if they were aware they enabled their videos to do that, or didn’t fully understand the process of uploading videos.

      Anytime I see actual ads on the internet, not just YouTube, it just makes me go “I am perfectly justified in not seeing these weird ads.” I don’t give them any money no matter what I do, so why not have my eyes saved from bright flashing colors and scam artists?

      • @dustyData@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        19
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        If I recall correctly, ever since videos could be called up as ads you can just pay for any video to be an ad, as long as it’s on YouTube, and it doesn’t have to be yours. I don’t know if this has changed, but an essays channel figured out that that’s the fastests way someone could target a competitor’s channel. Paying to have someone else’s video as an ad tanks that video ad revenue and discoverability instantly. Ad views count as views to the video and skipping an ad counts as a skip on the video which signals the algorithm to think that nobody wants or likes to see that video. Do it to enough new videos and you can entirely kill a previously profitable channel in a couple of months.

      • @RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        My first time ever installing an adblocker was during a rapid anti-smoking campaign

        Those ads made me want to take up smoking out of spite.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          132 years ago

          Ouch. Cutting off the nose to spite the face.

        • AutistoMephisto
          link
          fedilink
          English
          92 years ago

          That was the purpose. You see, Big Tobacco actually sponsors the anti-smoking campaigns, which does give them some creative input. They tell the writers to make them as annoying as possible.

          • Maeve
            link
            fedilink
            12 years ago

            They started messing with me on YT. When Piped began giving me errors last week, YT suddenly started behaving, but nagging me to try YT again. Google is truly evil, and dasterdly to boot .

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        52 years ago

        If it hadn’t been for ublock origin, I’d not be on YT this long

    • Maeve
      link
      fedilink
      202 years ago

      They could probably retain users simply by running ads every 10 minutes, rather than every 3 minutes.

      • Dojan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 years ago

        Oh but they don’t care about anything but short form content. If they could ditch supporting long form content today they would.

        • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
          link
          fedilink
          English
          152 years ago

          Nah they want lots of short form and also like 10 hour long videos that can play 200 ads in it that you forget is on in the background. They want tiktok and broadcast TV.

          They really just want to show you ads.

        • Maeve
          link
          fedilink
          42 years ago

          The cold, hard steel of the sword of truth.

          • BubbleMonkey
            link
            fedilink
            English
            22 years ago

            Such a fantastic series :) (the books, not any of the garbage adaptations)

            • Maeve
              link
              fedilink
              32 years ago

              This reply makes me so happy. The books are always better.

      • F/15/Cali@threads.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Money/s is the more used metric. Retention is secondary or even tertiary to money/s. Behold the algorithm, great and terrible, sheathed in robes of black and grasping sickle white.

        • @theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Ah, but you’re one layer off. Projected/potential money/s (in the next 1-2 quarters mainly) is what is truly king.

          It doesn’t have to be a good idea, it can be a terrible one - but good sounding words in the board room are what matter

          “Hey, so we’ve decided to see if we can run 10 unskippable ads back to back. Simultaneously, we’ve launched a war on ad blockers. This time it will surely work because we found out you can ignore your customers - Elon Musk has shown us the way, he only lost bots with all his innovation. We expect people to get over it in 3 months and estimate we’ll lose 4 users. Between 10x more ads and half our users off ad blockers, we project 20x ad revenue next quarter!”

          -Words of a future CEO, probably

    • @Croquette@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      502 years ago

      I was watching a long video on chromecast today and I had ads every three minutes or so. That’s a two hours video. The amount of ads is disgusting.

      YouTube is unwatchable without an ad blocker.

      • @InternetUser2012@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        222 years ago

        My kid would watch his videos with ads and I offered to set him up with an alternative with no ads. He said no, I like the ads. I said ok then. That was two years ago. Last week he was losing his shit because of all the ads that made it unwatchable. I set him up with the ad free alternative and I get thanked every day for it.

        Youtube is tanking their own platform.

    • @TitanLaGrange@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -52 years ago

      This is why I pay for YT Premium. No way in hell am I watching ads, but I do want to be able to use the platform, and the money has to come from somewhere. So far it’s been pretty good value, although SponsorBlock is of course still required.

      • @Moghul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        10
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        I would like to pay for YT Premium, but I think the service is bad. The product is good, and the service is bad.

        If I say I don’t want to see this video, I don’t want to see this fucking video again, youtube. I said don’t recommend this channel, and you said I won’t see it again, but I just refreshed, and there it is. I am not dutch, I don’t speak dutch, I’ve never even been to the Netherlands. I shouldn’t be seeing videos in dutch.

        Routinely, I have to go through my home page and try to train the algorithm but I’ve just given up. I got an extension now that just permanently removes channels and videos I don’t want to see.

        The thing is… the product is the videos, and youtube doesn’t do the videos. Youtube does the service, and the service is bad. I understand that the ads pay the youtubers but the truth is I don’t care. That pay is trash, and if they want my premium money, youtubers should unionize and force youtube to improve the service.

        Edit: I watch the youtuber’s sponsor spot and I buy merch.

        • Cyrus Draegur
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Hell YEAH they should unionize!!! YouTube has m effectively NO system in place for recourse when their shitty system fucks up and decides to nuke someone’s channel - Such as, when “supporting subject a” is against YouTube policy, a channel may make a video criticizing others who support “subject a”, YouTube’s stupid algorithm will punish them FOR AGREEING WITH YOUTUBE and never actually manually review their shit when it fucks up. A union can grab YouTube by the nuts and FORCE THEM TO LISTEN and that is painfully needed. Unions force power structures to listen to democracy and I like democracy. MORE UNIONS! the people DOING the fucking work need to be heard!

      • Cyrus Draegur
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Yes - AND I like that being a premium subscriber compensates creators I watch EVEN WHEN they are otherwise “demonetized” - like, if they cover news and the news contains upsetting information, YouTube will reduce their ad exposure. But my views still award them as much credit as ever, and count for, like, dozens of ad-supported views under normal circumstances.

  • @cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1102 years ago

    I haven’t seen an anti adblocker popup on youtube for a couple months now, I though they gave up. It looks like the uBlock developers and block list maintainers are just doing an excellent job staying ahead of whatever youtube is doing.

      • @rar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        172 years ago

        Bless the Revanced guys. They made my mobile youtube binge watches as smooth as my desktop firefox + ublock setup.

  • @FrostKing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    882 years ago

    Personally, I don’t think a service is in the wrong for trying to protect against ad block, especially when their revenue comes from ads. However I also don’t think there’s anything wrong with adblockers continuing to innovate to circumvent that. I’m rooting for Ublock Origin lol

    • KillingTimeItself
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 years ago

      they also fucked themselves over with the ad skill issues they’ve had over the years. Advertisers now find it to be more worthwhile to advertise directly with creators, though that also means they make a lot more money, so.

      They kinda dug their own grave, to be honest.

      • @force@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        38
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        What made me and I imagine a large chunk of other people convert to revanced/similar apps is the super aggressive advertising, it’s impossible to use youtube when you get a double ad before and after every 5 second video and get 30 second midrolls every like 3 minutes. You can’t skip through a video to find the part you want to see because you’ll just get an ad. It’s extremely infuriating and time-consuming, it used to be where I was willing to deal with it but they fucked it up. Now I can never go back to ad-riddled YouTube, even if it has a “reasonable” amount of advertising (I am now in the belief that no amount of advertising is reasonable anymore though).

        • @GCanuck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          162 years ago

          Yup. I was willing to watch one or two short ads before I watch a video, but the mid rolls and unskippable 30+second ads just made me say “well that’s enough of that”. Now I haven’t seen a YouTube ad in a long time.

        • @SendMePhotos@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Yes. Same. I was OK with banner ads. I was OK with intro ads. Started to get pissed off and annoyed at mid way ads, double ads, and unskippable ads. This is my nightmare. I hate this world and ads are a part of my pyramid of hell.

      • @bcron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Not only monetization but also the whole sorting/ranking algorithms. Youtube is a bit better than Facebook reels and instagram due to the thumbs down button, but some people go out of their way to make nonsensical garbage because viewers will then comment, and there’s no way to tell if a video is good or bad based solely on engagement. Those videos where people have some DIY hack to clean a toilet bowl and they just pour random condiments in the toilet for 3 minutes and cut the video before any conclusion, those types of videos

    • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      52 years ago

      This is what Louis Rossman said. Youtube is completely in their right to kick people off for blocking ads. At the same time, it’s also not a pissing match that’s worth getting heavily invested in, because ultimately Youtube is going to lose unless they can start coercing people into installing proprietary apps which they already have for mobile devices.

    • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      This is what Louis Rossman said. Youtube is completely in their right to kick people off for blocking ads. At the same time, it’s also not a pissing match that’s worth getting heavily invested in, because ultimately Youtube is going to lose unless they can start coercing people into installing proprietary apps which they already have for mobile devices.

  • @rasakaf679@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    822 years ago

    One 10-15 sec ad for an 5-10 mins video would be fair. Because if you calculate the ad shown in Cable TV it was similar I would watch them no problem. But NOOO these greedy fckrs want 3-5 ads of >15secs unskipable ads shoved down our throats. They have record profits. In a business if you are in profit then it’s a good thing. But these fcks want to increase profit year by year, not stable profit for the number of users. That want infinite growth and profit from a finite source and they crazy or what? So if anyone says blocking ads on YouTube is piracy, then fck you and those greedy fckrs. They crossed the limit long time ago and they are reaping what they had sowed.

    • @Ginger666@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 years ago

      No amount of ads are “fair”

      I’m done wasting my life for other people.

      Go ahead tho, you do you boo

      • @zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        232 years ago

        I’m done wasting my life for other people.

        I do enough of that at work as it is. I’ll be fucked if I do it during my downtime, too.

      • @lledrtx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 years ago

        How do you propose YouTube should pay for infrastructure costs (servers, Internet etc), staff costs (engineers, designers, moderators) and the content creators?

        • @RaoulDook@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Google Ads on the webpages of all the webpages on the Internet, similar to their status quo.

          I don’t think any of us should be concerned about Google’s cash flow. It’s their job.

          • @lledrtx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            42 years ago

            Are you saying that the ads shouldn’t be video ads but webpage ads, instead?

            It’s their job.

            Yeah, exactly why they are enforcing anti-adblock rules…

            • r3df0x ✡️✝☪️
              link
              fedilink
              English
              02 years ago

              If this is how Youtube advertised, I wouldn’t block the ads. I refuse to sit through ads when I’m searching through videos and I don’t even know if the video is the one I want to watch. It’s going to take a three minute search into a 10 minute search.

    • Encrypt-Keeper
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 years ago

      They’re publicly traded, they have to. Thats not an excuse mind you, but if you ever like a service and they go public, just understand the end users are no longer the focus.

        • Encrypt-Keeper
          link
          fedilink
          English
          19
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          It doesn’t force them legally, but it does effectively guide their behavior. There are a lot of things in this world we aren’t legally forced to do, but still have to do to participate in society. It’s not misinformation, it’s just the reality. It’s true that you don’t have to be an asshole to succeed, but it’s also true that you don’t have to go public to succeed either.

          • @exanime@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Not even… If the entire point was to maximize profit for shareholders, we would see you he obscene compensation packages for C-suite execs or ridiculously luxurious perks for board members, etc

            This has just been the excuse to do away with ethics and morals… And repeating this is “the way it has to be” just makes it easier for them

    • @piskertariot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Television shows are 22-24 minutes, because cable TV should show 6-8 minutes of ads every half hour. 30 second ads in blocks of 3 or 4, multiple times per show.

      15 seonds ads are almost too short for a trip to the kitchen. I’m not saying they’re good, but if you want to compare to cable TV, you need to remember the dark times.

      • NutWrench
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        Star Trek TOS episodes (1 hour show) were about 52 minutes long, with 8 minutes for commercials. By the time of TNG, episodes were down to 42 minutes. I regularly see ads every 5-6 minutes on YouTube.

        Businesses never understand that it’s THEIR obnoxious, sh*tty advertising that kills something profitable, and when it finally dies, it’s surprised Pikachu faces all around.

  • @RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    792 years ago

    I refuse to use the official youtube app. Its so trash… I use newpipe and its amazing to just have all my favorite videos bookmarked locally in different lists.

    If they take that away from me i will just stop using youtube.

  • @Kedly@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    642 years ago

    Since the initial push, I have not even had to reset my ublock… stop using Chrome

  • @MonkderDritte@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    622 years ago

    The web should have had a Terms of Usage from start. Something like

    “If you broadcast content on the internet, expect people to download it.”

    • @hightrix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      This. I always say this exact thing.

      If you provide content for free, expect people to take it for free.

      • @Malfeasant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        32 years ago

        Even if you don’t intend to provide it for free, if it’s possible to, expect it. No different from Walmart complaining about increased theft after replacing cashiers with self checkout - tiny violins.

  • HexesofVexes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Somewhere out there a CEO thought this was a good idea. All it seems to be doing is pushing people to other platforms (the younger gen moving over to tiktok and the older gens moving 3rd party or just offline).

    • dinckel
      link
      fedilink
      English
      312 years ago

      While I agree, the amount of people who’d do this is negligibly small, compared to their total userbase. Obviously a bunch of people use ad blockers, but only a tiny amount of them have modified apps, followed by an even tinier amount of those people with fully custom frontends. For YT it might work out as a net positive, because the annoying blocks and reminders will just pressure people into paying for Premium.

      At the end of the day, I could just stop watching youtube entirely, if this trend continues. I have nothing to gain there

      • @webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        I guess what there really winning is all those non tech-savvy people who currently have an adblocker installed because their friend helped.

      • Maeve
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Yes, been thinking I’ve just been substituting YT for * TV, and while the consumption can still be customized, it’s still a habit that can be kicked. I bet I’ll get more sleep and productivity.

        • Lol autocorrect
        • @theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Several months ago, fresh off the high of following through on my resolution to leave Reddit forever, I made the same decision with YouTube. Once ublock stopped working, I’d try out peer tube, or maybe sail the seas

          But ublock never stopped working. I watch more YouTube now than ever before, I got totally addicted as I binged in preparation to leave

          At this point, I don’t know if it’d be good for me, or send me in a desperate arms race to get my fix

  • @RonSijm@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    412 years ago

    YouTube is bringing its ad blocker fight to mobile. In an update on Monday, YouTube writes that users accessing videos through a third-party ad blocking app may encounter buffering issues or see an error message that reads, “The following content is not available on this app.”

    Yea, noticed that last week. Is already fixed again in latest revanced.

    • Rustmilian
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Revanced will never die. Stand against the Goliath.

        • @passepartout@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          192 years ago

          Vanced died because they tried to generate revenue from it and made themselves vulnerable.

          Also, unlike Vanced, Revanced doesn’t distribute modded youtube apks themselves.

          • sincle354
            link
            fedilink
            52 years ago

            Oh this? It’s just a binary of assorted diffs and plugins to a yet unspecified target apk. Why yes, I will use the end product for personal, non-commercial use.

            • @passepartout@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              Kind of funny if you read it like that, and while it certainly doesn’t make them immortal, it at least may make them last a while longer i hope.

              • sincle354
                link
                fedilink
                12 years ago

                It kinda comes out of the experience. There’s an outstanding Github issue that notes that a specific version of YT Music is broken past a certain version. Most of the patches fail to apply and you just get the minor ones. You can use the version just before with no issues. How can you litigate against lines of code that don’t even work? This is similar to the vulnerability that Yuzu gave up since they offered Patreon-exclusive updates to support a leaked BOTW:TOTK .iso. Easy to prove your intent there.

    • KptnAutismus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      yup, noticed that revanced wasn’t working a week ago.

      went into revanced manager, patched the recommended version, installed gmscore, done.

      suck it youtube, i’m not paying a subscription to watch low effort vtuber edits.

  • kratoz29
    link
    fedilink
    English
    392 years ago

    Oh, I definitely have experienced “The following content is not available on this app.” Before, but I thought it was just a thing of my Revanced version outdated because I rarely update it… Which I’m gonna do just now 😁

    I hope this doesn’t bring too many issues to Smart Tube, which is where I do 99% of my YT usage (and I have yet to be bothered with any bug).

    • @viking@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      Never had any outage in SmartTube either, unless they pushed a faulty release (I’m on the beta channel), but even then they have reacted super fast with fixes.

      So far I’m using NewPipe x Sponsorblock on my phone - apparently it has been discontinued & archived, but still works just fine as well. Only the comment view is broken since a couple weeks, but I really don’t care about those to begin with.

      • Bebo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        Nowadays I’m using tubular which is newpipe with sponsor block and youtube dislike incorporated.

        • youmaynotknow
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          Smart Tube in TV and Tubular on phone (plus Grayjay, but but I’m not fond of their UX).

          • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            32 years ago

            Grayjay

            Yeah, it kind of sucks, and the performance on my phone is worse than NewPipe, but I haven’t found anything else that combines feeds from other sources (Odysee, Nebula, etc), so I still use it.

            There are also some missing features, like browsing channel playlists.

            • youmaynotknow
              link
              fedilink
              English
              12 years ago

              It has a ways to make it go, for sure. That UX reminds me of WinAmp way back in the day 🤣

              • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                22 years ago

                WinAmp was awesome! I loved having it as a floating bar to control my music.

                But honestly, the UX is mostly okay for me, except the settings, that really needs some cleanup. Also, rotation is completely broken.

                • youmaynotknow
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  2 years ago

                  WinAmp was awesome! I loved having it as a floating bar to control my music.

                  Tell me we’re old without saying that we’re old 🤣

                  And in Grayjay, I the one thing that’s flawless for me is the screen rotation.

                  100% agree that the menus and settings need a serious overhaul.

        • @viking@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Oh good to know, I wasn’t looking for alternatives as long as it still works, but that’s going to be the future then. Thanks!

  • @Deeleres@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    352 years ago

    In Germany, there is a law that regulates the amount and intervals of advertising for private television broadcasters: 20% or 1/5 per broadcast day may be used for advertising. Programs that are shorter than 30 minutes may have a break, otherwise there must be 20 minutes between commercial breaks - 30 minutes in the evening. Unfortunately, there are still some loopholes.

    Children’s programs are not allowed to have commercial breaks.

    It’s a shame that this law still doesn’t apply to YouTube.

  • @csm10495@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    322 years ago

    Makes me miss a time where they couldn’t tell if ads were actually watched or not.

    Sooner or later, ad blockers should just simulate the ad being played (in the background) with the real content going in the foreground to act as if the ad was watched.

    Kind of like going to the bathroom during commercials.

    Then again I wish we had a real alternative to YouTube. (Don’t point me to the fediverse video stuff … that’s not what I mean.) There is no real competition for a place to freely upload videos … or on the other side find all that content. No one wants to scale enough to compete. (Very few probably could considering the amount of new content per minute).

    If only there was real competition, then YouTube would have to fight over our attention/usage by lowering ad count.

    No competition means worse for all.

    • Derpgon
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Well, YT is literally getting petabytes uploaded to it. Every single day. Thats 1000 terabytes, and thats 1000000 gigabytes.

      I bet you haven’t even seen a petabyte of storage in one place (assuming you didn’t go to a data center yourself). How is a small company, or even fediverse, gonna handle that? Thats absolutely insane amount of data and, without moderation or curation, it is not feasible.

      It’s a giant waste of space and resources, to be honest. Most videos are seen once, and the rest is mostly spam or bad quality content.

      • @Specal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        Actually the cost issues wouldn’t be the storage it’s self. Storage is pretty cheap, it’s content delivery networks. YouTube is supported by being owned and run by one of the worlds larges content delivery networks. There’s virtually no latency, videos play immediately.

        Having millions (potentially billions in YouTube’s case) of people accessing data at once is an immense challenge and YouTube perfected it pretty early on, that’s part of why there’s no competition.

        • Derpgon
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          Content delivery is not cheap, but not hard to do, either. I’d wager storage would be a bigger problem, because it just keeps rising. Sadly, YouTube is the one with money, and the monetization comes from people.

          • @Specal@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            52 years ago

            I can speak from experience that content delivery is harder than storage. Companies like YouTube tackle the storage issue by having tiered storage levels. Trending content is stored on SSDs, new and often viewed content is stored on harddrives with a caching system similar to optane and archived storage (essentially old videos that very rarely get views) goes on tape storage. It’s really cool, and it allows massive about of storage in a small space, it’s costs alot to implement but because of the tape storage they essentially have “infinite” (it’s not really infinite of course but it’s a problem for next decade not this decade).

      • @Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        Well break it up “lemmy wise” or more? I mean nobody can replace youtube but it would be possible having your own fishing channel for example. If it gets wildly watched you probably have to figure out some sponsorship for sure.

        BTW no I haven’tseen a PB storage, but I did write visualisation and computation software for treating and seing datastructures up to PB size with hdf5.

    • lost_faith
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 years ago

      Sooner or later, ad blockers should just simulate the ad being played (in the background) with the real content going in the foreground to act as if the ad was watched.

      I wish adblockers did this, open the ad in a little silenced sandbox window. I don’t see the ad, creator gets their pay

    • @fosstulate@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No one wants to scale enough to compete.

      I don’t consider scale important from the perspective of making and watching good videos. People get hung up on it when citing barriers to competition with Youtube, and while it’s certainly there, it only matters to Google itself (so it can continue to plausibly lie to its customers about ad impression numbers). In fact YT’s offering was at its creative peak when scale was lacking.

      It makes no difference to me whether a knowledgeable hobbyist has 20,000 subs or 250,000. I don’t care about their “content” suitability for advertisers (that creepy term can get nuked). I certainly couldn’t care less whether the algorithm promotes their work, deserving as it may be. This sort of creator operates on the assumption their viewers are intelligent, and is typically savvy enough to route around YT with alternate donation/support mechanisms. These people will continue on any platform. For them, quality is an end in itself rather than a feed-in to a metric. I would rather watch a badly filmed insightful critical appraisal of a new piece of hardware than Canadian/Black Technology Man’s 8K press release rehash full of slick cuts and pointless b-roll.

      Scale is the concern of middlemen.

    • @Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      I wonder about this. Youtube is made so that videos has to be long (10 minutes at least, or you won’t get exposure, right?) so we get all those dragged out videos with long summaries.

      Also you are supposed to earn money with it, which combined makes videos, IMO, often not very interesting.

      Sure, I get it, everyone can’t make videos all day long for free, but isn’t that something that we shouldn’t maybe want?

      I prefer a genuine hobbyist making one video a year, than a sponsored person pushing one a day.

      Which brings me to hosting and bandwidth needs, youtube needs a lot of that because of its business model, but say Lemmy communities could probably host quality videos without large hassle (especially if small servers wasn’t defederated all the time).

      Thoughts?

  • @lorkano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 years ago

    It’s kinda cute how they are utterly loosing with adblocker crackdown and now they are saying they will even handle their party apps. No company will handle an open source project full of talented people pissed of by ads.

    • @BURN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Reddit managed pretty well, let’s be real. The 3rd party app protests were essentially a speed bump that lost a tiny subsection of users that advertisers didn’t want anyways. Everyone else just migrated to the official app or website.