Judge denies HP’s plea to throw out all-in-one printer lockdown lawsuit - AiO devices won’t scan or fax without ink, and plaintiffs say IT giant illegally withheld that info from buyers::AiO devices won’t scan or fax without ink, and plaintiffs say IT giant illegally withheld that info from buyers

  • pitninja
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1682 years ago

    Am I the only one who thinks it’s crazy that the only grounds they have are that HP didn’t disclose that their All-In-Ones won’t let you scan or fax without ink and not, you know, the fact that they do that in the first place? It should be illegal to disable critical functions of a device simply because an unrelated function is temporarily unavailable. There’s no technical reason HP is doing this other than, “fuck you, buy more ink.”

    • brotazoa
      link
      fedilink
      English
      702 years ago

      Unfortunately this is the difference between illegal and unethical, and I don’t gather that HP cares much about ethics. Hopefully right-to-repair laws will cover these cases in the future too.

    • @C4d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      192 years ago

      The last and only printer that I bought from HP worked well and didn’t pull any shenanigans, it was a Laserjet 5L.

      Since then, feedback from colleagues and what I’ve seen from reviews and tech communities put me off buying HP again. Between their cloud printing, their inkjet cartridge verification and the USB ports covered in stickers and now this…

      • @eestileib@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        132 years ago

        Yeah HP is a disaster.

        They used to make good calculators too, including a financial model so good that I bought an Android emulator.

      • @krayj@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        112 years ago

        I still have a LaserJet 4000N in service (circa 1997 - same era as the 5L) and it’s a workhorse that never dies. Once upon a time, HP did take pride in their products. Even then, though, their toner cartridges were abusively overpriced - they just hadn’t yet figured out how to prevent 3rd party competition.

    • @Gsus4@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 years ago

      I mean, you can sell a shitty product, that’s not a crime, the crime is the false advertising or if it is a danger to people

    • @cordlesslamp@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 years ago

      Imagine in the future, your car just stopped working entirely and lock you out because your heated-seats subscription expired.

    • @Saneless@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      Canon did this to me years ago. Maybe 15. I haven’t given one cent to Canon since, and I was a big fan at the time with their cameras and such.

      Fucking greedy assholes

  • @Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    212 years ago

    I still don’t get why anyone is buying inkjet printers for the past 20 years. It makes zero sense to me.

    • @OskarAxolotl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 years ago

      Color laser printers are very expensive and still don’t achieve the same picture quality as an inkjet printer. And I have read once that dust from laser printers might cause cancer but not sure how much there really is to that.

      • @Skyrmir@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        Color lasers are about $300 dollars, do better quality, and have 10x the output per cartridge on a bad day. And they don’t dry rot when left without printing for extended periods. Replace the ink on an inkjet more than twice, and a laser is already a better deal.

        • @mipadaitu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          If you want to print pictures to hang on your wall, ink printers print much better color quality.

          If you want flat graphics to print on a document, laser is better.

          Just depends on what your use case is.

      • @anotherandrew@lemmy.mixdown.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 years ago

        Not just that, but it’s impossible to find a colour laser that’ll do 11x17 and duplex. I think my only option is a small office printer lease.

        • @OskarAxolotl@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          Huh? No, I am not. Find me an inexpensive laser printer that does color at the same level of quality as a basic inkjet printer.

            • @Apollo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              62 years ago

              This is gonna blow your mind mate - statements like “very expensive” are entirely subjective.

              Also ten times the price of the cheapest inkjet printers is considerably more expensive - one could even call that ‘very’ expensive in comparison, no?

    • @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      22 years ago

      Why is anyone buying a printer at all?

      Hey, printer people out there! What do you you use your printer for? My printer is just sitting idle collecting dust. Can’t think of anything I would need to print. Everything is digital these days.

      • @Hexarei@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        62 years ago

        I have a printer for the occasional need to print documents. Mind blowing I know, but that’s why I keep one around. It gathers dust most of the time, but it’s super useful when the odd need arises.

      • @gaael@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        I for one can’t read correctly anything longer than a lemmy post on a screen. I print more or less anything that I’m want to read with my brain fully present - I usually outline and comment on paper too, makes it easier to remember. Latest use case : printing out dnd character sheets to do my charac design for BG3

        • @Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          Ok, that seems like a sensible use case.

          I’ve heard many people say that reading stuff on a screen is more distracting and they have trouble focusing. I don’t feel that way, so screens are just fine for me.

    • Name is Optional
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 years ago

      My in-laws gave my son an HP Envy. I placed a big Apple logo next to the HP logo. I have Apple logos on my trash bins too. Basically, any trash around the house gets an Apple logo stuck to it

  • meseek #2982
    link
    fedilink
    English
    182 years ago

    “IT giant illegally left out that info”. Bruh. THEY LIED!