California, the biggest state in the US when it comes to both population and the sheer volume of tech companies squeezed into its borders, has just passed the country’s most extreme right to repair bill in the US (via Ars Technica). It’s the third state to pass such a bill, but goes further than either Minnesota or New York in that it forces companies to support their products for longer. But while it will cover gaming PCs and laptops, games console manufacturers get a free pass.

There are exceptions, however, and it seems like games consoles are somehow exempt from this right to repair requirement. Guess someone’s been lobbying against the inclusion of consoles, eh? The bill itself talks specifically about an “electronic or appliance product” or just a “product”, but stipulates that doesn’t include a video game console.

“‘Video game console’ means a computing device, including its components and peripherals, that is primarily used by consumers for playing video games, such as a console machine, a handheld console device, or another device or system. ‘Video game console’ does not include a general or an all-purpose computer, which includes, but is not limited to, a desktop computer, laptop, tablet, or cell phone.”

So, that means your Xbox, PlayStation, and Switch consoles are all seemingly exempt from having to offer long term support, but at least in the computing space your PC and laptop will be covered.

    • Dept
      link
      fedilink
      English
      572 years ago

      they did show the iPhone 15 playing resident evil village

      • @XTornado@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Unless it switches to primarily being used for playing games that is a no.

        That said that presentation (and some othe previous stuff)… make some suspect that an apple console that is only digital and pulls from their store isn’t that far fetched nowadays. Or s new apple tv more gaming oriented I guess.

    • @CaptFeather@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Wait holy shit. I was in a thread talking about the 15 and it was mentioned that Apple seems to be heading this way with the hardware they’ve been adding. This would explain why they didn’t fight this bill

  • 𝔼𝕩𝕦𝕤𝕚𝕒
    link
    fedilink
    English
    61
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Why yes! My product the Google iPixel ZFold 15 is a gaming console! You would think it’s a phone because of the calling and phone-like features however it is exempt from right-to-repair because it plays Genshin with more fraps than any other gizmo and doohicky in anyone’s pocket in this hemisphere!

    And you would be remiss to assume my Grapple ThinkPad 2025 is a mere laptop! Nay! A gaming console it is! It can’t even run the Chrome Dinosaur for 35 seconds without running out of RAM and is really built for content creation and the school setting in mind, but it is absolutely built for gaming and also omitted from right-to-repair!!

  • @DigitalNeighbor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    312 years ago

    Console vendors, particularly Nintendo absolutely hate it when someone tries to thinker with their products. There was a Darknet Diaries podcast from August 1 named ‘Team Xecuter’ that gives some insight into this. Funnily enough, not every country is encouraging this behavior from Nintendo like the U.S. is. France is pretty lenient on console modders, for example.

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Umm… important context: Team Xecuters work was based on enabling piracy on the device. It had fuck all to do with repairs or non-security-compromising mods

  • sadreality
    link
    fedilink
    212 years ago

    Because fuck you peasants… What you are gonna about it, bitches?

    • Cosmic Cleric
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Hopefully at the very least they’ll call their state representatives and tell them about the bullshitness of this exclusion.

  • Orphie Baby
    link
    fedilink
    English
    152 years ago

    Japan would rather die. Microsoft, I don’t know what their shit deal is.

    • @NuPNuA@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      252 years ago

      Doesn’t really matter, Valve are happy for you to do what you like with it already.

        • @virtualbriefcase@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          My guess is it would be considered a general purpose computer, assuming it runs standard Win/Linux and can run any software even if it’s specs and shape are geared towards games.

          Not a lawyer though, just guessing

        • @NuPNuA@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          I don’t get the context of this question at all? Like, would it come under console definition, or just what would I think in general?

          • @CleverFunnyName@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            You said it doesn’t matter if it’s a video game system or a handheld pc because Valve doesn’t care what you do with it. Another company might care what you do with their similar device, so perhaps it would matter to you then.

            And the point is that we should consider whether details of a legal decision matter regardless of the specific companies involved.

            • @NuPNuA@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              Someone specifically asked what it would count as and I pointed out that valve are already repair friendly. I was only talking in the context of that specific machine.

    • 520
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      PC. It’s running PC hardware and PC software.

  • Cosmic Cleric
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 years ago

    So how many of you are planning on contacting your state representative to tell them this exclusion in the new law is bullshit?