• @Linssiili@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      132 years ago

      Have you tried it? At least for me, I often get better results compared to google. Also Kagi has a free trial of 100 searches.

      Granted I’m a developer, so my job is basically just searching for information, so getting better results is really valuable for me.

    • ram
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      Totally valid. For me the killer feature is being able to change the weights for various sites, making it so websites with content that’s not useful to me or I don’t like don’t appear[1], pinning websites that I consider best-of-class for their relevant searches[2], and prioritizing websites I do like, but aren’t always the best answer[3].

      They also have a “Lenses” feature that lets you make your own search lens (like I have one for Lemmy-only results), but I’ve not really had much use for those.


      1. e.g. apple.com, facebook, nypost, quora ↩︎

      2. e.g. wikipedia, the ffxiv wiki ↩︎

      3. e.g. opencritic, speedrun.com, cbc, w3schools, github ↩︎

      • @goji@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        The regex redirect feature is another massive pro. I hope they bring it into Orion as well.

        I already use Stop the Madness for this, and probably will continue to as it’s a more global solution, but having it built right into the search engine at least shows they’re taking real steps to hand control back to the user.

        • ram
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 years ago

          Oh ya I use that as well, to turn Youtube results into Invidious, reddit into web.archive.org/save/, twitter into nitter, tiktok into proxitok, and AMP results into normal articles. It’s nice because, since I use kagi on my phone, it reaches where extensions don’t normally.

      • shastaxc
        link
        fedilink
        -22 years ago

        I’m pretty sure there are browser extensions that already do this for you on Google. You can do it manually on each search but that’s obviously cumbersome. But browser extensions are basically what you’re describing and still free

        • ram
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 years ago

          There’s literally not. For blocking, sure, but not changing the behaviours of your search algorithm.

            • ram
              link
              fedilink
              English
              32 years ago

              Blocks sites you specify from appearing in Google search results

              I wonder if you even read my comment? Also chill, there’s no need to condescend over a search engine lmao.

              • shastaxc
                link
                fedilink
                42 years ago

                Yeah you’re right. I only read up to the part about blocking sites and got excited to share my knowledge. Sorry.

                • ram
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 years ago

                  I appreciate the apology ♥

    • @narwhal@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      92 years ago

      There’s the 5$/month option available if you don’t search more than 300 times a month.

    • @ink@r.nf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -12 years ago

      It’s cheaper to just run SearXNG instance. People claiming any new search engine is better than established ones are hallucinating with their anecdotes.

      • Kayn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 years ago

        How easy is it for an average Joe to set up their own SearXNG instance?

        • The Doctor
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 years ago

          It appears a bit more difficult than setting up the original Searx. I’ve been poking around in the code for SearXNG lately because I’m planning on migrating to it but haven’t done any serious work with it yet.

  • I posted this further down the thread, but I’ll put it here so it’s more visible in case the discussion is interesting.

    According to this source, DuckDuckGo makes ~$0.0027 per search from ad revenue. Kagi @ $5/300 searches is ~$0.01667/search, or >6x higher than DDG’s ad revenue. So is the overall value proposition from Kagi >6x higher than DDG?

    Or to put it another way, for ~$5/month, I can get unlimited VPN through Mullvad, which if I’m not mistaken is quite a bit more resource intensive than search per added customer.

    So $5/month for 300 searches, or $10/month for unlimited is a tough pill to swallow, especially when I have no guarantees that they’re not also selling my data. If they were a nonprofit, I’d trust them a bit more and just chalk the higher cost up to limited scale, but AFAIK they’re private so they have little incentive to reduce prices as they get more popular.

    So I’m skeptical.

    • SokathHisEyesOpen
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 years ago

      I’ve been paying $10 per month for 1000 searches for a few months now and had no plans on cancelling. This unlimited change makes it even better. Not being constantly frustrated by poor search results trying to sell you stuff or influence what you’re looking for is worth the money.

  • seeg
    link
    fedilink
    102 years ago

    @narwhal Anyone recommending self-hosting searchx instead

    1. https://dalf.github.io/searxng/donate.html They also ask for donations to help improve code
    2. Cheapest server is at around $5/month.
    3. Maintenance, upgrades, DDOS protection and whatnot also costs money.
    4. You’re still only as good as Google results allow you to be.
    • @goo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      Correct. Same dum dums complaining about the proce are there ones buying $12 lattes/day.

      • PLAVAT🧿S
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        For some, money is tight, and there are already so many subscriptions available for premium service. Many of those are solutions to combat forced enshitification. The Internet is too powerful of a tool to back us into paying for every little feature. So forgive me for being a dum dum and not giving in and enabling these services that aim to nickel and dime.

        • @goo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          02 years ago

          No one is saying that you should pay for every little feature.

          This whole thread is about a service which, in my opinion, is worth that $10 (or $5 for the standard plan) when its results are way better than the alternatives and, as the business plan is clear, it doesn’t sell you to third-parties.

          And obviously, I don’t assume that the same people above who suggest self-hosting SearXNG are in remote third world countries, because economically the price is on par with it. (Yeah, yeah, “But muh $5/mo vps can do it!” You manage that and keep up with it and see how you like it just to save those nickels and dimes.)

          Search was never free. And we’re talking about just $10.

  • loathsome dongeater
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 years ago

    300 searches per month for 5 USD sounds a bit expensive. That’s about 10 searches per day. Sometimes I have had to try four or five variations of a search query to find what I am looking for on Google. Having to worry about exhausting a paid search quota sounds a little bit nerve-racking.

  • A Cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    42 years ago

    Nah, I’ll just self host SearXNG.

  • @nyakojiru@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    -62 years ago

    Pay for search? There should be another approach… at this rate will be paying for every single thing we do on internet and navigating properly would require a bunch of money .

    • Kayn
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      You are already paying everywhere with your attention and your time by watching ads, it’s just been normalized to the point of you not realizing it.

      And if you’re using an ad blocker, that’s effectively piracy.

    • Hannes
      link
      fedilink
      52 years ago

      It’s either this or ads or selling your data

      • Oh, there’s a third way. Like DuckDuckGo & Qwant for example. Just have sponsored ads unrelated to you, or ads related to the specific search only (Without detailing your actual search terms to the one buying the ads) and selected companies in such “store” articles results.

        • Hannes
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          I said it’s ads or selling data - it can be any combination of those 3 factors

        • @smellythief@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          User choice in the form of multiple tiers would be ideal. I might or might not pay to remove non-creepy ads depending on how they’re presented.

    • mayooooo
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      Yeah, I want to pay some sort of tax so that I can afford all of this stuff. Patreon this, patreon that, pay email, pay for search, I’m not made out of money

  • @willya@lemmyf.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -7
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    Who wants to celebrate by gifting me a year? Good news though as the prices were pretty ridiculous overall. I think I’ll stay on the $5 plan as I seem to be hitting ~170 searches a month ATM.