• Chemical Wonka
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    three 6k monitors is far from the realitty of 99,999999% of users

    • @MeepMorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      66 months ago

      I use four monitors for my WFH setup with a total of 11.8m pixels. Three 6k monitors is 37.3m pixels, more than three times what I’ve got. I’d be seriously considering this if I could run all four, but for now the hackintosh lives on.

    • @IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      And? It’s clearly a feature for professionals. 3 4k monitors is currently a pain in the ass and does get used in business.

      • Chemical Wonka
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        even for professionals is too much. Few ones needs three 6k monitor

        • @QuarterSwede@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          3
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Honestly, even 3 isn’t enough at times and I’m not doing anything crazy. Mostly Chrome, Teams, WhatsApp (ugh), Outlook, and Excel (god, so much excel).

        • @IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          26 months ago

          And yet you’ve somehow run into someone provisioning similar setups on Lemmy. Maybe apple knows their use base better than you think.

  • paraphrand
    link
    fedilink
    English
    56 months ago

    lol, in the example promo photo the third very expensive monitor is used to show a flyer promoting the music creation event being depicted. Great use case.

    • @datavoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      16 months ago

      I feel like having a file explorer and web browser open on a different monitor when producing music is fairly typical