• @gelberhut@lemdro.id
    link
    fedilink
    English
    92 years ago

    Not that many. Strange that they did not pitch wired charging as faster or less power consuming or something like that…

    • ijeffM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      112 years ago

      Might be too small of a difference to matter with their implementation. As an aside, the 24 hr battery life is a disappointment IMO.

        • @rutenl@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 years ago

          The advantage mentioned in the article is easier connection to the charger and slightly faster charging

          • @gelberhut@lemdro.id
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            2 years ago

            yes, but google itself claimed nothing. If it would really reduce heating and reduce energy needed to charge the watch - google would mentioned this - this is good for the environment.
            according to data I have seen charging speed improvement is formal like 65 min instead of 70 for 0 to 100% and same time from 0 to 50%

            I assume that the real reason either cost reduction or space for extra sensors.

  • macallik
    link
    fedilink
    32 years ago

    Battery life is my biggest concern. I see 24 hour battery life w/ Always-On display… does anyone have any references that speak to the battery life when the feature is turned off?

    Looking to replace a Garmin watch that lasts 4-5 days and trying to see whether it’ll be worth it

  • junderwood
    link
    fedilink
    English
    12 years ago

    I just wanna listen to my audiobooks while on my morning walk without carrying my phone.