Found this notification this morning on my pixel 6.

  • Laurel Raven
    link
    fedilink
    English
    433 days ago

    Okay, turned it off. If a site needs my location it can ask me and I can politely tell it to fuck off unless it has a warrant.

  • BetterNotBigger
    link
    fedilink
    English
    4384 days ago

    Even if this isn’t entirely true, you know Google wouldn’t pass up the opportunity to reduce Firefox market share to scare everyone back to Chrome.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        156
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Yes, chrome is doing something different. It is even worse!

      • @pycorax@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        924 days ago

        That’s not the point they’re trying to make I think. It’s more of an attack on perfection. Like “the alternative is not perfect either so why not just stay with Chrome”. It’s not a very strong argument in general but it might be enough to keep people from switching.

        • JayGray91
          link
          fedilink
          184 days ago

          the alternative is not perfect either so why not just stay

          It does work for a lot of people. Seeing they need to change and adapt if they do change, and it seemingly seems to be as bad as what they’re using now, why change and face headaches and hassle.

        • @acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          44 days ago

          exactly, when confronted with cognitive dissonance people look for any shitty excuse to avoid changing their minds.

          • @T156@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            5
            edit-2
            4 days ago

            Zen, at least from the few times that I’ve tried it, also has some major issues that I personally find to be deal-breakers. Like forgetting tabs in a window that has just been closed. If you accidentally close a window that you’re working, without quitting the browser, you lose everything in it. As someone who is prone to doing that when closing a tab, it’s not ideal.

      • @ThunderWhiskers@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        It integrates into the Google ecosystem well, and if that has value to a person it may just be enough to bring them back to chrome.

    • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      224 days ago

      There’s no need to reduce Firefox marketshare. Most people don’t even consider using anything else than whatever is default in their device.

      Also, it’s not a Google scare tactic or a flex. Every application on the Play Store must disclose the general outlines of their data policy, including the sharing of data. Lying with those checkbox is not a good idea but they are completely informative and put there by the publishing party, so the people responsible for publishing Firefox on mobile just updated these, and this is what is shown when an app publisher say their app is sharing data with third parties.

      tl;dr: it’s very likely that not a single soul at Google even looked at this, as this is just the regular behavior of the Play Store with apps that changes their data policy or indicate sharing user data with third parties.

        • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          33 days ago

          No idea, I’m not that obsessed with it. But do note that “The developers of these apps provided info about their data sharing practices to an app store. They may update it over time.” and “Data sharing practices may vary based on your app version, use, region, and age.”

          The recent changes to Firefox terms of use (well, their introduction really) was supposedly meant to appease some regional lawmakers. Maybe it is a regional thing. Maybe they changed it again. Maybe it’s, as often with store page update, rolled out progressively to people (in either direction, whether it’s adding or removing these terms).

          The point is, that’s neither a “Google” operation to put Firefox in a bad light, nor a Mozilla operation to… do whatever it is they’re doing these days. It’s just a regular message. Which, reading a lot of the replies here, is something that have to be said.

    • Balder
      link
      fedilink
      English
      294 days ago

      I wonder if they say people should be careful with Chrome 😂

    • Engywook
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      There isn’t to much to reduce. I don’t think Google is scared or afraid by Firefox, like at all.

    • Ulrich
      link
      fedilink
      English
      4
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      Firefox? You mean the company they give several hundred million dollars/year? Yeah I don’t think they’re too worried. They need some number of users on Firefox to prevent anti-trust issues. Which they’re on the brink of right now.

    • @morrowind@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 days ago

      Lol if Google really wanted to kill FF they would just stop paying them half a billion a year.

    • @Xanza@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -14 days ago

      So you’re advocating that Google shouldn’t broadcast that firefox is broadcasting your current location? Even though they do this for every other app available on Android, you’re saying they shouldn’t do this for firefox?

      Why?

      • The Octonaut
        link
        fedilink
        English
        224 days ago

        This notice is effectively added by the Firefox developers when they select the ability to enable location services and also tick a box thay they collect data.

      • @devedeset@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -34 days ago

        They want to scare people to stay on Chrome now that they discontinued support of uBlock (not that it was ever supported on Chrome for Android anyway)

        • @Xanza@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 days ago

          So they do this for all apps. Every single app that is in the Android ecosystem. But in your mind they’re specifically targeting firefox with this to make people “scared” huh?

          Must be nice to live in denial.

  • katy ✨
    link
    fedilink
    English
    85
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    i mean it’s just because you can grant websites location data and toggle telemetry.

  • kingthrillgore
    link
    fedilink
    English
    483 days ago

    Google: “Forcing us to divest Chrome could have impacts on our ability to support Mozilla and their high executive salaries as we own the space with Chrome.”

    Also Google:

  • @umbraroze@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    463 days ago

    Wait a second. You’re expecting Google to not FUD? Ha ha ha oh wow. I mean I didn’t actually expect them to do so, but yeah.

  • @hungprocess@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    88
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    FWIW I’m not seeing this on the Play Store for Firefox 136.0.1 on my Pixel 8a, and I’m not seeing any warnings on Beta or Nightly either:

    • fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      43 days ago

      I don’t see it from installs direct via Obtainium, either.

  • @devedeset@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    804 days ago

    As of the latest Chrome update on PC, they have dropped support for uBlock. You can still technically enable it, but they disabled it by default once you update.

    That got me back to Firefox with breakneck speed.

    • @milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      174 days ago

      Hopefully soon Librewolf, Fennec F-droid and other forks will become mainstream.

      I haven’t switched to Librewolf on pc yet; hoping that turning off the telemetry/etc options in ff is enough, but I’m starting to think it might not be long.

      • @Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 days ago

        I was that same way with Firefox for a while, but after I gave Librewolf a long-term test drive I stuck with it.

        If you’re used to Firefox with the privacy stuff cranked up, from a user perspective Librewolf is basically just that. But I like knowing that some of the Mozilla stuff is actually removed.

        They also roll out updates quickly. I’m pretty sure I updated Firefox and Librewolf to 136.0.1 today just hours apart.

      • @FrChazzz@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 days ago

        I switched over to LibreWolf recently. I discovered Vivaldi just a few hours before I learned about the Manifest v3 stuff for Chromium (which is a shame because I actually LOVED Vivaldi). I really want to try Zen Browser, but I’m using old, 2011-era Macs (running Ubuntu 24.04 on one) and it won’t install. LibreWolf is great because of its clean, minimal design and absolute privacy-forward thinking. I’ve enjoyed it so far (and I’m only running it on the Ubuntu machine).

      • @devedeset@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 days ago

        I want to switch over further but so far I’ve had so much else going on that data privacy hasn’t taken a priority. Things are getting weird now so it is time for a priority change.

    • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -44 days ago

      Frankly speaking, calling out Google and Chrome, then moving to Firefox while Mozilla have been doing it’s best Google impression for years now is not that great of a plan.

      I wonder how long Firefox will be ok with all that, since Mozilla bought that advertisement business a while ago.

      • @JeffKerman1999@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        184 days ago

        The main problem is that building a web browser is extremely difficult and everyone else uses Google’s version of WebKit. So there’s no alternatives: it’s either Google or Mozilla. Forks don’t count because if some functionality that end users need is deprecated, nobody will maintain it and it will just disappear once it’s removed from the main codebase

        • @cley_faye@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          53 days ago

          Yes, I agree. That’s why I’m weirded out by people saying “Firefox bad, use Librewolf” and the like.

          I still think a solution that relies on donation (maybe with some corporate support) would be very good for everyone involved. Unfortunately, Mozilla is not a player in this, so we’re stuck with basically three engines, one that can’t be used, one that’s openly hostile, and one that’s becoming hostile.

          Not great.

        • @uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -23 days ago

          building a web browser is extremely difficult and everyone else uses Google’s version of WebKit

          To be fair it is based on KHTML. One of projects KDE can spend that extra money on and resurrect.