• Maeve
    link
    fedilink
    2026 months ago

    In a press conference on June 5, San Antonio Police Chief William McManus said that the department’s earlier statement saying there was “no evidence” Joss’ murder was “related to his sexual orientation” was “way premature” and “before we had any real information.”

    Still lying.

    • @Rooskie91@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      1076 months ago

      "While it may be true that we told a lie before we had evidence, we really wanted that first lie to be true, so it’s cool, right?

          • @grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            326 months ago

            They had years of evidence of previous hate crimes.

            Hell, the only reason they were at the place to begin with was to check the mail at the ashes of their previous house that had been burned down by a gay-hating arsonist.

              • @nomy@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                206 months ago

                Someone burned their house down (presumably killing their dog) and then placed the dog skull in the driveway to lure them back. When they came back the neighbor came at them calling them slurs and opened fire.

                Seems pretty suspicious to me, weird that the local cops couldn’t piece it together.

                • @SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  176 months ago

                  The local cops know exactly what happened. The only shocking revelation would be that they didn’t actively have anything to do with the crimes.

    • TipRing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      536 months ago

      So according to the Chief, their detective did not interview the surviving victim of the crime before talking to the press. Snappy police work there. “We’re not bigots who enabled this murder by ignoring the prior complaints of the victims, we’re just really stupid. Golly!”

  • @foggy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1726 months ago

    The fucking account from his husband is the most clear cut hate crime shit.

    They came home to their dead dogs skull in their driveway before the assailant approached them, yelling homophobic slurs, and shot him. Also, someone in their neighborhood set their house in fire earlier this year.

    Fuck that county. I hope that king of the hill money gets used to turn that fucking county admin inside out.

    • @phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      16 months ago

      “someone”

      I think we can make a good guess as to who that might have been

  • @CooperHawkes@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    1596 months ago

    And they would have kept it as a “non hate crime” if the victim had not been a part of two popular TV shows…

    • @Fredselfish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      686 months ago

      Wait house fucking arrest!!! Are you fucking kidding me? He murdered someone and it definitely was fucking hate crime and he isn’t sitting in a fucking jail cell. Fuck Texas and fuck the police.

          • @ebolapie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            346 months ago

            I hate to be that guy in this case but he has not been convicted, and so he is an alleged murderer. He deserves the pre-trial treatment we would like to be given to someone who has been wrongly accused.

            I wish him a speedy trial and a very fucking long execution.

            • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              96 months ago

              He deserves the pre-trial treatment we would like to be given to someone who has been wrongly accused.

              Compare his treatment to Luigi’s.

              • @prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                06 months ago

                Part of this, even if Luigi did nothing and shouldn’t be in jail in the first place for something someone else did, is the culprit in that murder was caught on camera acting with intent and there is no hearsay about what happened.

          • thermal_shock
            link
            fedilink
            English
            9
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Alleged. Evidence and things still need to come together. Innocent until proven guilty, or a flight risk.

            Still get due process. I’m not defending his actions, but it still needs to be proven in court.

  • @Widdershins@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    586 months ago

    I’ve been watching King of the Hill at work (all shift sometimes) recently and it’s gotten to be real difficult to see the antagonistic characters on the show in the same light. Cartoons are supposed to be an exaggeration of their real life counterparts. Knowing what texas is harboring in real life really washes out the humor these antagonists are supposed to bring.

    • @Soggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      266 months ago

      I currently recommend staying out entirely because of the paranoid war against “immigration” that has made our borders openly hostile to everybody, but if that ever changes there’s plenty of cities that are only as shitty as global average and if the national parks survive they are unmatched.

  • How was the husband’s testimony not suggestive of a hate crime? It’s like suggesting the guy who firebombed people in Boulder Colorado last week wasn’t committing a hate crime.

    • @scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      256 months ago

      Afaik the Colorado thing wasn’t a hate crime, it was an act of terrorism. It was motivated by political cause (antizionism), not identity (Jewishness).

    • Not to mention there are likely records of past incidents where they were threatened. Cops are now pretending like they weren’t aware of the hate crime issue before he was even dead.