We estimate that by 2025, Signal will require approximately $50 million dollars a year to operate—and this is very lean compared to other popular messaging apps that don’t respect your privacy.

    • @smeg@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      401 year ago

      I imagine not paying for it and being overloaded with spam bots would be more expensive (otherwise they wouldn’t be doing it this way!)

      • @jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Anonymity is a form of privacy. While for most people it’s not necessary to be anonymous to have privacy, it’s essential in some cases, like whistleblowers or people living under dictatorships (or even in some democracies where governments keeps trying to get their paws on all metadata).

  • TWeaK
    link
    fedilink
    English
    331 year ago

    They could save a lot on infrastructure costs if they decentralised their network and stopped using phone numbers as unique identifiers.

    • Alex
      link
      fedilink
      331 year ago

      I’m all for decentralised networks, but they do have their flaws. I use Matrix every day, and there are a lot of times the keys need to be resent, messages don’t get sent or deleted on shaky internet, etc. Issues like this make it seem broken to normies. Signal Just Works™️

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 year ago

        Absolutely, and I use Signal for a few things. It’s not a perfect solution, but it’s far better than most (looking at you, Facebook’s WhatsApp, with your previous Pegasus attack vector).

      • @abhibeckert@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        9
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Signal Just Works™️

        Until you drop your phone in the swimming pool, and every message/photo you’ve ever received is just… gone. Forever.

        Sorry but I don’t buy any claim that Signal “just works”. It’s pretty clear they care about security more than anything else even when that means making decisions that are user hostile. And that’s fine - if you feel like you need that level of security I’m glad Signal exists. But it doesn’t really align with the general public and Signal is never going to be a mass market messaging service unless something changes (Signal or the general public).

        What’s weird to me is an app that excludes itself from phone backups considers SMS a valid form of authentication when a user links a device to a phone number - especially when you can necessarily link a device to a number that is already tied to someone else’s device. Like how is that ever going to be secure? Spoiler: it’s not. It’d make a lot more sense to me if users simply crated a username and shared it with other people instead of a phone number… and if they forget their password… come up with new username.

        • @slowbyrne@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          81 year ago

          Signal provides a backup option. The auto backup for SMS on android is provided by google and likely uses google drive. I don’t know for certain but I would guess the encryption options and security of that route would be impossible to guarantee and the public backlash of signal users knowing their data was being sent to Google’s servers would be massive.

          I’ve setup my signal backups to a local folder on my phone. I then have SyncThing running on my phone and home computer so it automatically gets sent once it’s created.

          • Alex
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            +1 for this. From my tests, SimpleX seems fast, reliable, secure, and private. I haven’t tried daily driving it, though.

            • @sqgl@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              3
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Downside is minor bugs re inviting friends:

              Gets confused by invites from Facebook (can’t automatically strip the trailing tracking code from the URL).

              Fails scan of QR invite with your maybe camera app. Must scan from app.

      • @GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        Quote from the blog post:

        Registration Fees

        Signal incurs expenses when people download Signal and sign up for an account, or when they re-register on a new device. We use third-party services to send a registration code via SMS or voice call in order to verify that the person in possession of a given phone number actually intended to sign up for a Signal account. This is a critical step in helping to prevent spam accounts from signing up for the service and rendering it completely unusable—a non-trivial problem for any popular messaging app.

        SMS verification is expensive.

        Obviously, running the infrastructure to support the entire user base is also expensive. Decentralized protocols like Matrix sidestep this problem by allowing anyone to host their own infrastructure to use the network. Even if the largest Matrix server shuts down, the network will live on, and people can migrate to another server or host their own. This distributes the costs and allows for different business models to support those costs – commercial, non-profit, cooperative, whatever. Corporations can (and do) host their own Matrix servers for their employees, for instance. I wouldn’t be surprised to see universities do the same, like they frequently do with email.

      • kpw
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        There’s an IETF internet standard for federated messaging called XMPP. Just be compatible with the standard. It also allows for extensions if you offer more than the core spec.

      • TWeaK
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 year ago

        There’s a few forks that have done it. You could also look to Matrix to see how they’ve done it.

      • @noodlejetski@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        the phone number is still going to be required for making an account, you can just choose to not share it with others and give them your username instead.

      • @Zworf@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        Yes but you still need one and you still lose access to your account if you lose your number.

  • @onlinepersona@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    321 year ago

    In total, around 50 full-time employees currently work on Signal

    […]

    When benefits, HR services, taxes, recruiting, and salaries are included, this translates to around $19 million dollars per year.

    That’s 380k/employee on average. Even if half of that went to taxes and other expenses, on average they’re paying their employees around 190k/year.

    Bro, as a European dev, that’s triple my salary! They could possibly double or triple their workforce if they hired from outside of the US.

    • snrkl
      link
      fedilink
      231 year ago

      When running a business, you need to budget 3x salary for actual TCO of a staff member:

      1x covers their direct salary 2x covers retirement fund, electricity, office space, and infrastructure items unlike server and laptops for corporate use etc.

      The 3x multiplier is for when you’re a services company, and that represents a possibly profit margin.

      So for signal, your $380k becomes $190k which in my experience is average for a US tech sw dev at a mid to early senior level.

      I donate to signal monthly and I have no problems with the costs they’re posting. I work in SV tech and I’ve seen 20x worse numbers.

        • snrkl
          link
          fedilink
          61 year ago

          I’ve used the 3x multiplier for staff planning at services companies since the early 2000s.

          Perhaps there are regional differences, but they’ve rung true for planning billable rates of return at every services company I’ve worked at in the last 20 years here in AU.

          I realise that the services aspect isn’t relevant, but having the sum of indirect staff costs equivalent to staff salary cost when office space is involved isn’t a massive stretch in my experience. (Indirect costs would include office rent, utilities, infrastructure and a share of shared functions such as IT, HR, facilities etc…)

      • @Zworf@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        3x is too much tbh. It’s more like 2x in total, at least going by european points of view - I don’t know what would make the US more expensive though with even less welfare. And office space in these days is a diminishing cost of course with all the hybrid/remote options. Laptops cost is pretty negligible. I think Signal does have a lot of hosting costs though.

    • @papertowels@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      141 year ago

      As an American dev, you should check out other silicon valley salaries. After hearing what some folks there make 190k doesn’t make me bat an eye.

    • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      I don’t care if employees are well paid. I do care that Signal takes 50 employees to operate. What are they all doing? This is a genuine question

      • @onlinepersona@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        281 year ago

        You did not read the article, did you?

        This is a lot of work, and we do it with a small and mighty team. In total, around 50 full-time employees currently work on Signal, a number that is shockingly small by industry standards. For example, LINE Corporation, the developers of the LINE messaging app popular in Japan, has around 3,100 employees, while the division of Kakao Corp that develops KakaoTalk, a messaging app popular in Korea, has around 4,000 employees. Employee counts at bigger corporations like Malus, Meta, and Google’s parent company (Alphabet) are much, much higher.

        • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          12
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I can’t speak for LINE - But Kakao does a heck of a lot more than messaging; it’s one of the top companies to work for and the defacto app of Korea. It’s used for taxis, webtoons, payments, music streaming, banking, social media, OAuth, etc (and that’s on top of all its failed ventures no one uses). So yeah, it makes sense to have a lot more employees. Getting into Kakao is like getting into Google or Apple in the West.

          It also doesn’t explain why Signal has 50. Signal is open source, but openly hostile to forks which throttles its development. So I wonder, what are those 50 employees doing? I genuinely would like to see a breakdown

          • @Zworf@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            Yeah it’s the hostility to forks and federation I genuinely don’t like. Federation is important, and forks are important so I can use the service as I wish, not as they wish me to.

            Of course it’s a market and I can vote with my feet and I have. I just linked it to Matrix for availability but I don’t actively use it from my end. And I have a grand total of 1 person regularly communicating with me through it :P Versus about 50 on whatsapp and another 50 on telegram (not to mention the countless telegram groups I’m in). But they all end up in one and the same matrix for me <3

            Self-hosting all these bridges used to be a royal PITA but there’s some very kind people that made this amazing ansible playbook that takes care of it all now.

        • CarrotIsland
          link
          fedilink
          English
          101 year ago

          Worth mentioning, as someone has for Kakao below, the LINE app has a magnitude or two or three more features than Signal. Beyond chat, the app handles payments including retail via QR, effectively has Instagram and TikTok built in, has an entire news section, and much more.

          Heck, LINE the company even has permanent and pop-up merchandise stores in downtown Tokyo (Harajuku) and their own MVNO mobile carrier called LINE Mobile.

          Now that said, I loathe LINE, the app. The UX is poor and the app is bloated behind belief. Only use it effectively out of necessity as someone living in Japan. The only alternative communications channel even remotely close in usage is probably Instagram chat.

      • @Poutinetown@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        251 year ago

        When Whatsapp was sold to Facebook in 2014, they had 55 employees. Considering the app had considerably less features and did not focus so heavily on encryption and privacy, Signal can be considered even leaner than Whatsapp.

        Now, for the actual breakdown, they have at least the following technical teams: desktop, android, iOS, server, calls (ringrtc), core (libsignal). If we assume a team has usually 5 people (manager, Sr SWE, Jr SWE, QA, maybe PM), that’s already 30 people. On top of that, they have an in house support team (don’t know the size but I wouldn’t be surprised if they have 10ppl on the payroll considering the number of signal users) and management (CEO, CTO, CSO, VP), which will quickly add up to around 50.

    • @Zworf@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That is indeed a lot. They must have most of these in Silicon Valley.

      However it is their choice to do so. They don’t have to be in the most expensive place in the world for developers.

      I prefer sponsoring matrix though as it’s really open. Signal is just a slightly nicer walled garden. Also, Matrix doesn’t need to be linked to my mobile number which is a godsend because I tend to change those once in a while and it’s a real nightmare bringing all whatsapp contacts over.

  • @Vlyn@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    151 year ago

    Is it just me or is $19 million per year for 50 full-time employees insane?

    Even for US salary standards.

    • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
      link
      fedilink
      311 year ago

      Not necessarily.

      Signal has people who are experts in their field. They engineer solutions that don’t exist anywhere else in the market to ensure they have as little information on you as possible while keeping you secure [0]. This in turn means high compensation + benefits. You don’t want to be paying your key developers peanuts as that makes them liable to taking bribes from adversaries to “oops” a security vulnerability in the service. In addition, the higher compensation is a great way to mitigate losing talent to private organizations who can afford it.

      [0] Signal has engineered the following technologies that all work to ensure your privacy and security:

      • kpw
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        At least the private contact discovery is not very private:

        The client calculates the truncated SHA256 hash of each phone number in the device’s address book.
        The client transmits those truncated hashes to the service.

        Phone numbers are so not-sparse that there even was a game to text your “number neighbor”. I can probably build a pretty effective rainbow table for this with my current hardware.

        • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          You’re right, but security and privacy is about layers, not always 100% effective mitigations, especially not when the mitigation is a function (contact discovery) that requires a private list (your contacts) be compared against another one. For anyone where this is an actual security risk, they don’t have to to share their contacts. They will not know which of their friends/family are on Signal, but they can still use the service.

          This feature does protect users in that any legal court order for Signal to present who is friends with who (as almost every other messaging provider has actual access to your list of contacts) is not possible. They’ve been subpoenaed multiple times[0] and all they can show is when an account was created and the last day (not time) a client pinged their servers.

          Lastly, I’m not sure if this is even a feature or not but it wouldn’t be too difficult to introduce rate-limiting to mitigate this issue even more. As an example, its very unlikely that most people have thousands (or even tens of thousands) of people in their contacts. Assuming we go just a step beyond the 99th percentile, you can effectively block anyone as soon as they start trying to crawl the entire phone number address space, preventing the issue you’re describing.

          [0] https://signal.org/bigbrother/

    • Phoenix [she/they]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      111 year ago

      My guess: People who can be as competent with security as they need are very expensive.

    • JelleWho
      link
      fedilink
      91 year ago

      For the current distribution I quote from the linked source :

      Current Infrastructure Costs (as of November 2023): Approximately $14 million dollars per year.

      • Storage: $1.3 million dollars per year.
      • Servers: $2.9 million dollars per year.
      • Registration Fees: $6 million dollars per year.
      • Total Bandwidth: $2.8 million dollars per year.
      • Additional Services: $700,000 dollars per year.
      • @Vlyn@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        51 year ago

        Yes, but I was talking about the salary part, which is separate from the costs you mentioned.

        It’s 19 million just for people.

        • JelleWho
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Yhea no worries, I was just trying to get all the budgets together. I agree it seems quite an high budget

      • @li10@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Also from the source:

        To sustain our ongoing development efforts, about half of Signal’s overall operating budget goes towards recruiting, compensating, and retaining the people who build and care for Signal. When benefits, HR services, taxes, recruiting, and salaries are included, this translates to around $19 million dollars per year.

    • Avid Amoeba
      link
      fedilink
      8
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Not at all. That’s $380K per person if everyone is making the same. Engineers with a few years of experience at Meta make $400K+.

    • TheChurn
      link
      fedilink
      61 year ago

      Role of thumb is an employee costs roughly twice their base salary, as the employee still needs to cover insurance, taxes, sick time, and other benefits.

      That leaves an average salary of 190K for the 50 employees. That isn’t much for tech.

  • Would be interesting to see how this compares to XMPP or Matrix. Obviously the development costs something for each of those, but the hosting costs are spread out across each of those hosting an instance.

    • @u_tamtam@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Yup, that’s a big reason why centralized protocols aren’t sustainable. XMPP is 25 years old (which is older than almost anything else on the contemporary internet) and thriving. Unfortunately, judging by the cycle of messengers coming and dying, and people still being eagerly part of that, this isn’t something that people value very much.

      • @erwan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It’s possible to implement XMPP with E2E encryption, there are at least 2 ways to do it.

        But of course it only works if both users use a client and server that support it.

  • /home/pineapplelover
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    They should do a charity stream event or something. Do Q&A stuff, get interest of more people, and raise money?

  • visnudeva
    link
    fedilink
    81 year ago

    Are decentralised apps like element much less expensive ?

    • @Zworf@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      101 year ago

      The costs are distributed as there is not one single instance. Just like with Lemmy.

      Although there is one huge instance on matrix (matrix.org), a bit like lemmy.ml here. But it doesn’t have to be like that, they can close signups or discourage them similar to the way lemmy.ml is doing that now.

    • @amki@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      81 year ago

      The load distributes across more shoulders automatically.

      If you only host a server for yourself and 10 friends it costs next to nothing, if you have a big operation it can get just as expensive, it depends on what you are willing to do.

      With centralized systems there is no choice but for the one centralized host to host everything.

      • visnudeva
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Then is it better to use element over signal as decentralised apps may be more sustainable for long term use ?

    • @justJanne@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      Element has the same costs as Signal. So far, Element has been lucky in being able to raise money by selling support contracts to governments or companies using Matrix, but even that isn’t enough, which is why Element has been raising money for the Matrix Foundation for almost a year now (with little success).

      • @Zworf@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No but they do have commercial clients, even some government departments.

        They’re also trying to sell Element One directly to end users which involved a few bridges like connection to whatsapp, signal and telegram. Not a bad deal for 5 bucks a month IMO, though I run mine myself because I want to.

        There’s also beeper which sells a service with (a lot) more bridges than Element One but costs twice the price. Their company sponsors most of the bridge development as they employ the main bridge developer.

    • @sqgl@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      21 year ago

      Indeed. Same tech as Signal (minus the new quantum insurance thing) but without needing a phone number. Unfortunately it is buggy re invitations.