@Generative@aussie.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-22 years agoWhat problems are the AT protocol trying to solve that are not already solved by ActivityPub?message-square6fedilinkarrow-up146arrow-down18
arrow-up138arrow-down1message-squareWhat problems are the AT protocol trying to solve that are not already solved by ActivityPub?@Generative@aussie.zone to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-22 years agomessage-square6fedilink
minus-square@fraydabson@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 years agoI feel this explains it well - https://atproto.com/guides/faq
minus-squaresteve228uklinkfedilinkEnglish11•2 years agoI have still never bought this reasoning. A far better approach would be to propose an ActivityPub 2.0 as an RFC.
minus-square@Mereo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglish5•2 years agoIn my opinion, as long as it is not an RFC, it will go nowhere.
I feel this explains it well - https://atproto.com/guides/faq
I have still never bought this reasoning. A far better approach would be to propose an ActivityPub 2.0 as an RFC.
In my opinion, as long as it is not an RFC, it will go nowhere.