• @1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    7818 hours ago

    I guess this is an attempt to discredit them.

    After working at many, many companies, security is usually very bad. This is typical. Not changing access tokens is also very common.

    • @Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2118 hours ago

      Discrediting someone usually has a goal of pushing customers to another source though. There is no other source of this information, so what would be the point?

      • @qfe0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        8617 hours ago

        Destroy a source of historical documents so that the past can be contested. Sew doubt, confusion, deniability. Hide evidence of past crimes, or inconvenient documents. Plant documents, etc.

        • @Gigasser@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Lol, we should create a society of sorts along the lines of the original Bavarian Illuminati. Create a decentralized storage network and archive of knowledge and history. Create a list of important shit that needs to be archived, and delegate standardized chunks (let’s say 5 or 10gb each chunk) of data that are to be downloaded by people. Anytime 5 or 10 people have downloaded a chunk, strike it off the list of priority archival and move onto the next chunk. For this to work, needs alot of people though.