The fact that this has been replicated is amazing!

  • @Adeptfuckup@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 years ago

    Hitch your tits and pucker up. We’re entering a new age of industry. Much like the original Industrial Revolution, technology is going to advance at an extremely rapid pace. Fusion, quantum computing supremacy. Just… wow. How far off is general AI with this new room temperature superconductor?

    • Dr. Dabbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 years ago

      Fusion is no closer than ever before, and AGI is hilariously over hyped. Also no closer than ever before.

      • @Proweruser@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 years ago

        And Fusion is pretty close to begin with. Commonwealth Fusion is well within their purpose time table so far. They don’t need any new superconductors for their project.

      • Dr. Dabbles
        link
        fedilink
        English
        142 years ago

        What’s holding back AGI is a complete lack of progress toward anything like intelligence. What we have now isn’t intelligent, it’s multi-variable probability.

        • @JGrffn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 years ago

          It’s not that it’s not intelligent, it’s that predictive language models are obviously just one piece of the puzzle, and we’re going to need all the pieces to get to AGI. It’s looking incredibly doable if we figured out how to make something that’s dumb but sounds smarter than most of us already. We just need to connect it to other models that handle other things better.

          • Dr. Dabbles
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            You don’t speak predictively. It’s not one of the pieces, it’s a parlor trick.

          • @Ogmios@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 years ago

            The biggest hurdle is that we don’t actually know what intelligence really is at all yet, computationally. Most of the history of science has been repeatedly learning “but things were actually more complicated than originally expected,” so making claims that we’re soon to be able to replicate something that we don’t actually properly understand yet may be a bit premature. The desire to replicate human intelligence by a machine has been around since at least the 1200’s brazen heads, and yet for everything we’ve discovered since we’re still just beating our heads against a wall trying to sleuth out what it really is that makes us ‘think.’

      • @knotthatone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 years ago

        Simply throwing computing power at the existing models won’t get us general AI. It will let us develop bigger and more complex models, but there’s no guarantee that’ll get us closer to the real thing.