The clearest legislative priority of the Trump administration and the Republican-led Congress is to keep taxes low for the richest households and corporations. Last week, House Republicans submitted a budget resolution that calls for $880 billion in cuts to Medicaid—the program that provides health insurance for low-income Americans—to help pay for extending the 2017 Tax…
Voting under duress seems like a better option than not voting though
Except the status quo loses. We can argue all day that status quo is better than the alternative but that doesn’t win elections. There is no amount of pressure or bullying or arguing that makes that a winning election strategy.
At that point, it’s the fault of the status quo party for not moving off that status quo. It’s the fault of party leadership for not shifting to progressive change and instead saying “steady as she goes”
Sure, yeah, whatever, place blame where you want to. Doesn’t change the fact that “getting to vote” is better than “not getting to vote”
Brother in Christ, how many elections do the Dems need to lose before it’s their fault for running the same status quo handbook? Do you actually give a shit about trying to fix anything, place blame on the decision makers who have a choice, or so you just want to grand stand on a vague general population and rage against human nature resulting in low voter turnout that literally nobody can solve? We can be mad together that people didn’t come out to vote, but ultimately we can’t change that. So what the fuck do you want?
I think you misunderstand me. We likely aren’t getting the chance to vote again. That’s my point, that’s it. I’m not trying to place blame, I’m not trying to fix anything, I’m not raging or grandstanding, I’m merely making a prediction. Which is that because Trump won the election, that’s the last real election we’ll have.
Well yes but that’s the problem, we need to think outside the box, revolutions are seen as a thing of the past but maybe everyone could learn from the french
Someone hasn’t read a history book it seems. Please, enlighten us about how that revolution turned out.
I believe Robespierre had lead a period of time known as the “reign of good times and normal vibes” where they all formed committees to talk out and mediate the the problems of the system they lived under.
I lol’d
Only someone with no knowledge of pre revolution France would say this.
The point is that a revolution didn’t make things any better overall. It just sucked in different ways.
It ultimately gave us the ideals that would go on to end monarchism in Europe. It killed the French monarchy legitimacy until it was ultimately destroyed.
Once again, only if you know nothing about the French revolution would you say that.
So any revolution against aristocracy obviosly leads to a Bonaparte, is your theory huh. ok.
Yep, I made a blanket statement about every revolution that has ever existed… Of course I didn’t say that, why are you putting words in my mouth? The French Revolution ended poorly for most in the following 40 years. That’s what I said.