Malus, which is a piece of “satire” but also fully functional, performs a “clean room” clone of open source software, meaning users could then sell, redistribute, etc. the software without crediting the original developers. But I have a hard time with the “clean room” argument since the LLM doing the behind-the-scenes work has already ingested the entire corpus of open source software – and somehow the output of the LLMs isn’t considered a derivative work.

  • artifexOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    121 day ago

    Yep. But good luck getting a court to agree with you.

    • @slacktoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      101 day ago

      Omg Imagine if half of the case is just an ML course to teach the jury what training data is.

      • searabbit
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 day ago

        That sounds painful. Absolutely no shade to the lovely older person I overheard today say: “so how do you get the little folks on the screen to know what buttons I pressed?”

        But I’m guessing it could be similar to music copywrite law where jurors don’t have to understand audio engineering to know two samples sound the same.

        • @slacktoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 day ago

          Nope the class will be dropped down to teach all the basics and then up to vector databases and word embeddings to understand the case.

          • TehPers
            link
            fedilink
            English
            17 hours ago

            I would expect the jury to be nothing less than world-class experts on statistics, linear algebra, and calculus once the case is decided.