• @Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    621 day ago

    I’ve seen AUR warned against often, also by Arch team members.
    I never thought it was a huge deal, but apparently anything that can be attacked will be attacked nowadays.

    • Pumpkin Escobar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      920 hours ago

      I start to wonder if we need something sitting between extra and aur, few more trusted maintainers and well secured update process that’s more than the aur Wild West

      Also, some sort of yay hook to do some scanning for suspicious diffs and warning or skipping those packages…

      I don’t want / need a system where I can blindly update everything, but something to help me avoid having to visually check every package diff would be nice

        • Cethin
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 hours ago

          Their first option is possible for sure. Just something like the AUR, but that you need a proven record (either on the AUR or on something else) to post. That shouldn’t be too hard.

      • Bobby Turkalino
        link
        fedilink
        English
        318 hours ago

        I feel like this could be a use for LLMs that isn’t slop. It’s not going to catch everything of course but I imagine it would be a whole lot better than nothing

    • @Holytimes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1723 hours ago

      This is what happens when a shit load of packages that just sit around basically unmaintained are allowed to sit around.