• kamen
    link
    fedilink
    English
    622 years ago

    He’s probably right, but from what I see, the reality is that like 95% of people simply don’t care, and the rest will find an alternative.

    • @owf@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      32 years ago

      Thing is, Google is also (still) just better.

      I use DDG as my primary search engine, but I find myself repeating searches with Google so often, I wrote a userscript to add a “Search with Google” link to the top of the DDG search results.

      • @octochamp@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        132 years ago

        I’ve seen a lot of chat recently about Google search quality tanking and it’s made me realise that I haven’t re-searched a DDG query in Google for a really, really long time. when I first started using DDG as my main a few years back, I would repeat searches in Google probably 25% of the time? but I honestly can’t remember the last time I had to now. Been at least 6 months!

        • WuTang
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          unfortunately, I do that often. Even when using meta search engine which sources to google, Google UX and results are simply better but sometime feeling is just not rationale

          regarding duckduckgo, it is simply too long to type and people rarely configure their browser, especially on mobile.

          so yeah, in a sense, Weinberg is right. At the very least, a choice should be provided on first run but you can’t force people to be curious.

      • @BurnedDonutHole@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        12 years ago

        I agree. At least in my experience Google does a better job when it comes to search engine. I use DDG as well but when it comes to searching specific things Google beats it unfortunately.