Probably because it isn’t actually the important part. And also because he did, in fact, quote it in full before repeating the part he found important.
yeah… but in my opinion it is the important part… imo it is okay to use an llm to get a reference implementation and then you refactor it into aworking piece that you understand and comment afterwards
Okay, the “must be understood” is the important part when discussing what’s good about the rule, and the “must originate from” is the important part when discussing what’s problematic about the rule.
why did you omit the important part of that quote
Probably because it isn’t actually the important part. And also because he did, in fact, quote it in full before repeating the part he found important.
yeah… but in my opinion it is the important part… imo it is okay to use an llm to get a reference implementation and then you refactor it into aworking piece that you understand and comment afterwards
Okay, the “must be understood” is the important part when discussing what’s good about the rule, and the “must originate from” is the important part when discussing what’s problematic about the rule.