@time2lose@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 days agoVoid Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy disputewww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square54fedilinkarrow-up1124arrow-down13cross-posted to: newslinux@lemmy.mlprogramming@programming.dev
arrow-up1121arrow-down1external-linkVoid Linux maintainer orphans 100+ packages over AI policy disputewww.phoronix.com@time2lose@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.worldEnglish • 5 days agomessage-square54fedilinkcross-posted to: newslinux@lemmy.mlprogramming@programming.dev
minus-squaresemlinkfedilinkEnglish1•22 hours agoSeeking to understand: this type of code review LLM usage is disallowed in the Void project, correct? You cannot make code reviews or security audits which originated from an LLM?
minus-square@HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglish2•18 hours agoThe rules are cited above. As I read it, you can make code reviews using LLMs. But: You have to disclose this usage You have to describe the results in your own words You need to make a fix yourself.
Seeking to understand: this type of code review LLM usage is disallowed in the Void project, correct?
You cannot make code reviews or security audits which originated from an LLM?
The rules are cited above. As I read it, you can make code reviews using LLMs.
But: