L4sBotMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agoLiving to 120 is becoming an imaginable prospectwww.economist.comexternal-linkmessage-square172fedilinkarrow-up1304arrow-down128
arrow-up1276arrow-down1external-linkLiving to 120 is becoming an imaginable prospectwww.economist.comL4sBotMB to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 years agomessage-square172fedilink
minus-square@Sheik@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish32•2 years agoBy properly taxing companies and rich individuals? Besides, those leaving to 120 would most likely be among the richest of us. Do they really need a pension at all?
minus-square@happyhippo@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoSorry, but if one can dream of properly taxing companies and rich individuals, there’s plenty of other shit to fix with that money first. Making living until 120 sustainable is not on the list, or very, very low on it.
minus-square@RobertOwnageJunior@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 years agoThat’s just not happening.
minus-squareJJROKCZlinkfedilinkEnglish4•2 years agoIt should be though, we need to demand change rather than just saying “oh they’ll never do it” and giving up.
By properly taxing companies and rich individuals? Besides, those leaving to 120 would most likely be among the richest of us. Do they really need a pension at all?
Sorry, but if one can dream of properly taxing companies and rich individuals, there’s plenty of other shit to fix with that money first.
Making living until 120 sustainable is not on the list, or very, very low on it.
That’s just not happening.
It should be though, we need to demand change rather than just saying “oh they’ll never do it” and giving up.