• Alto
    link
    fedilink
    31 year ago

    Didn’t it tuen out that it was literally just the same architecture? Doesn’t really mean shit

    • Exactly, same architecture means nothing if it only draws a fraction of the power, eg from a battery and not mains. Not only that, but size and cooling constraints mean with our current tech, it’s impossible to have a small handheld as powerful as current gen consoles

    • BolexForSoup
      link
      fedilink
      4
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Honestly the biggest barrier is nintendo’s policy of making profit on hardware. Microsoft loses $100-$200 per console and the XSX still costs $500. Is nintendo really ready to charge $600 or even $700 for a console that matches what was released 3 years ago? 4 probably by launch?

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        The biggest barrier is that Nvidia has shown no capability to make a CPU that isn’t unconditional dogshit for gaming, and the CPU is the Switch’s problem.

        The only company that’s made an ARM CPU remotely interesting is Apple.

      • Alto
        link
        fedilink
        11 year ago

        It’s not going to be, it’s (from what I’ve seen) simply the same architecture. It’ll probably be what’s essentially a very cut down and underpowered (as in literally uses less power) version of it. Still a massive step up from the switch, which was already well outdated when it launched, but it’s not going to touch PS5 performance