@limerod@reddthat.comM to Android@lemdro.idEnglish • 1 year agoThe Kirin 9000s loses to its nearly 3-year older predecessor in benchmarksm.gsmarena.comexternal-linkmessage-square3fedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down10
arrow-up143arrow-down1external-linkThe Kirin 9000s loses to its nearly 3-year older predecessor in benchmarksm.gsmarena.com@limerod@reddthat.comM to Android@lemdro.idEnglish • 1 year agomessage-square3fedilink
Nanoreview comparison: https://nanoreview.net/en/soc-compare/hisilicon-kirin-9000s-vs-hisilicon-kirin-9000
minus-squarepgetsoslinkfedilink14•1 year agoExpected, since Hisislicon doesn’t have access to advanced process nodes, like 5nm equivalent and 3nm equivalent. They are stuck at 7nm equivalent. For me, it is impressive they are only 2-3 years behind at this moment.
minus-square@limerod@reddthat.comOPMlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 year agoTrue. Being able to match snapdragon 870 is no small feat. With time they should be able to surpass current gen snapdragon.
Expected, since Hisislicon doesn’t have access to advanced process nodes, like 5nm equivalent and 3nm equivalent. They are stuck at 7nm equivalent.
For me, it is impressive they are only 2-3 years behind at this moment.
True. Being able to match snapdragon 870 is no small feat. With time they should be able to surpass current gen snapdragon.