• Irina
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    I’ve heard good things about Kagi, but I can’t justify the cost (especially as its USD)

    • 👍Maximum Derek👍
      link
      fedilink
      152 years ago

      If it were half the cost or if all the tiers had unlimited searches I’d probably subscribe, but I don’t want to ration the searches the way I used to have to ration dialup minutes.

      • @blindsight@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        This is what I felt about Neeva, too. Metered searches meant I only used it when I “needed” it… By which point I was mired in search results and focused on my Google Fu and completely forgot about Neeva.

        I get that it costs money to run, but they needed a long free trial to get me hooked, then a reasonably priced unlimited tier. I was never going to use a site that restricts my search volume.

        • 👍Maximum Derek👍
          link
          fedilink
          22 years ago

          There was a limit to Neeva? I payed $55/year for unlimited searches, but maybe I was in some tier that became unavailable or something.

          I think that has set my price expectations.

          • @blindsight@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            22 years ago

            iirc, their trial tier was 100 searches total, or something like. I could never adequately test it so I never converted to a paid user.

    • oneguynick
      link
      fedilink
      22 years ago

      @irasponsible I am on month 2 of paying for Kagi, and I am not sure it’s worth it at the current price point. I enjoy the privacy and speed, but not 10 dollars a month enjoy.

      @noodlejetski

      • Irina
        link
        fedilink
        32 years ago

        even at US$5 a month, I don’t know. I feel like most searches I do are just to get to the website I already know the name of, and I’d blow through 300 pretty fast.

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍
    link
    fedilink
    132 years ago

    I was one of Neeva’s die hard users. I was bummed but not surprised when they emailed out saying they were pivoting to AI.

    • I used them for a while as well. Their search was good, and their auto-generated answers they provided was very decent. I loved the idea of non-ad supported search. For me, their problem was their value proposition. You could use search for free, but you have to pay them if you want them to index your github/dropbox/etc accounts, so they could be searchable from the same searchbox. I had no need to have any private accounts searched, so never needed those licensed features.

      • 👍Maximum Derek👍
        link
        fedilink
        72 years ago

        I’ve been using Duck Duck Go, but I mainly use it because bangs make it easy to search elsewhere when DDG isn’t surfacing useful stuff. So I don’t entirely endorse it.

  • Google is still the GOAT for very specific questions. Like “docker network bridge partial packet loss” , throw it into bing/dfg/qwang and you just end up with “what is a network bridge in docker”

  • hugz
    link
    fedilink
    52 years ago

    I was a Neeva user. It was good, but no better than DDG. Google is so bad these days that it isn’t much better than DDG, aside from regional things

    • CuriousGoo
      link
      fedilink
      12 years ago

      I just use DDG, and I was told in a different post that it fetches results through Bing.

      Much like what you said, Google is better than other engines with regional results being a non-US person.