• Asherah
    link
    fedilink
    2159 months ago

    I’m voting for Biden. Not happily, not even simply neutral on the matter. I hate that I have to vote for Biden.

    If AOC ran, I would not be even a little reluctant to vote for her. She reminds me of Bernie.

    • Zerlyna
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1419 months ago

      I’m voting for the Biden administration. It’s more than just him. We need them all.

      • @noevidenz@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        599 months ago

        AOC is currently 34 and her birthday is in October, so she will actually be old enough to be president by the time of the election.

        • @finestnothing@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Yeah, but you know people will throw out misinformation saying she can’t actually become president because she’s 34 and some people will believe them and stick with Biden or someone else who we know for damn sure is over 35 and it’ll just split the vote unless Biden (and any other big names on the left) drop out

    • Phoenixz
      link
      fedilink
      109 months ago

      Biden is close to senile, and I’m assuming he’ll pass away within the next 4 years. Honestly, I hope he’ll win the elections and then peacefully passes away. Nothing against him personally, he seems like a nice guy but what the US (and by extension, the world, thanks for that) needs is not a narcissistic psychopath, and also not a senile grandfather for president.

    • @lengau@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      89 months ago

      This is her first election where she’s eligible to run for president. I wouldn’t be surprised to see her run in 2028

    • @eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      If AOC ran, I would not be even a little reluctant to vote for her. She reminds me of Bernie.

      same here

      i’m struggling to get myself to vote for biden; i vacillate on it every day and i wish my history and future of enduring biden et al.'s policies wasn’t clouding my decision.

  • Neato
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1359 months ago

    Fuck yeah. Probably won’t go anywhere with a traitorous house majority but it’s worth it to try and get them on the record.

    • Justagamer
      link
      fedilink
      199 months ago

      I am still hoping for the day to see someone of the same party convict a politician.

      If anyone has any cases I’d love a link!

      • @solrize@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        129 months ago

        Nixon resigned a day(?) after the impeachment articles were filed, because House Republicans told him that he didn’t have enough support in the party to not get convicted.

        • Justagamer
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          I am curious if Nixon was in the same situation in 2024 how it would go down now.

        • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          If a judge is a politician

          The fact that is a thought that is reasonable to be expressed is part of the problem. Judges (and the justice system in general) should not be political in the slightest.

          • Justagamer
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            It’s a shame too as I believe the original intention for judges to have a lifetime position was so they no longer had to be concerned with allegiance in an election.

            But I assume those lawmakers didn’t know how fanatical or greedy judges could be lol

  • Snot Flickerman
    link
    fedilink
    English
    589 months ago

    If you’re going to do the thing with replacing Biden as the candidate, you couldn’t get better than AOC, who will be 35 before November.

    I personally think replacing Biden this late is a bad move even though I already think Biden sucks. But I grit my teeth and voted for the fucker just like I did with Clinton, because the alternative is literally insanity and fascism. I just don’t realsitically seeing the party coalesce around anyone new at the last minute. Organizing Democrats is like herding cats, being a big tent party sucks noodles.

    • Ghostface
      link
      fedilink
      English
      529 months ago

      Just keep repeating, Biden may not be the best, but his administration has been fantastic!

      In comparison to the other party… Not just Biden you are voting for the administration. Supreme court justices Which affect everyday life!

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        129 months ago

        Exactly this. So the party doesn’t do what I would personally prefer. I still prefer whatever the fuck they’re doing over outright fascism.

      • @Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        99 months ago

        He knows how to delegate to people who are smarter than him. He also knows the importance of ‘tone at the top’ in getting the best out of his team. This is what makes him the better candidate.

      • balderdash
        link
        fedilink
        -1
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Good domestic policy. Bad foreign policy. Or have we all collectively forgot about the wars?

        Edit: You all were very loudly criticizing Biden on Israel a few weeks ago, but fine, I guess Lemmy has moved on.

        • @kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          29 months ago

          have we all collectively forgot about the wars?

          The wars that he didn’t start? The wars that the aggressors are ignoring what Biden demands?

          The ones where Trump is buddy-buddy with those ordering war crimes?

          Those wars?

          • balderdash
            link
            fedilink
            -1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Israel in particular, yes. Before the debate everyone was criticizing Biden for continuing to financially support a genocide.

            But I guess nobody cares about Palestine now.

      • balderdash
        link
        fedilink
        -29 months ago

        Shhh, don’t mention other countries. Nothing to see here, just keep listening to the establishment democrats telling us anything other than Biden is impossible. And then four years from now the fight for democracy will continue.

    • @Count042@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      129 months ago

      I’ve seen this criticism of replacing Biden often recently “it’s too late! We won’t have time!”

      Putting aside for the moment that it isn’t late at all and complaints that it is feel like talking points, Biden IS old. The stats on someone his age dying that year are extremely high. There is a good chance he dies before the election.

      If there isn’t a plan to deal with that fairly likely possibility, then there isn’t a plan to win.

      Anyone in a position of power in the DNC making this claim is them confessing their own incompetence.

      • Snot Flickerman
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Hey man I’ve been dealing with the shitty outcomes of the politicians who lead this party being unwilling to listen to the public until well after the public has been proven right for my entire adult life.

        I said Biden was too old in 2020. He’s even too older now. The party didn’t give a fuck and has spent their time hiding it and fucking us out of having primaries.

        Who do you think will choose the new candidate? The same super delegates who gave us Hillary Clinton? It won’t be a people’s vote at the convention, it will be delegates, many of which are party apparatchiks.

        Do you think the people who hid Biden’s issues this late in the game will suddenly make a good choice? I don’t. The party fucked us into this position and I do not think they are capable of unfucking us, sorry. Biden is who we have, alive or dead.

          • Snot Flickerman
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Hey I’m not the one pretending that the same people who fucked this up can save us. That’s you. I’m just accepting where we’re at.

            You gotta be naive if you think the party is going to hand the reigns to the people now after *checks notes… about thirty years of this shit.

            But sure, have the party replace Biden with another fucking loser just like him, we’ll see how that goes.

            • @Schmoo@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              19 months ago

              If they do replace him, it will just be with Kamala. The only thing up in the air would be who to appoint as her running mate.

              IMO they should just do it ASAP. I honestly think Kamala would attract way more voters than Biden. She certainly has her issues but no worse than Biden’s and she’s way better on optics.

      • @MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        279 months ago

        She’s more ready than Trump is who was already “president.”

        That said, I would rather her be in Congress longer because she can be a voice longer. After 8 years of being president if elected, she wouldn’t then want to become a senator or whatever. That would pretty much be it for her in politics outside of ex-president things… and she’d only be 43.

        I’m also sure Kamala would be pissed if AOC were to get the nom instead of her. Not that that matters.

    • balderdash
      link
      fedilink
      09 months ago

      Guess we’ll have to wait and see. If Biden stays in and young people don’t show up to vote, everyone will blame voters and not the DNC; even though the entire argument for Biden is his supposed electability.

      We’re in such dangerous waters right now that we might as well throw caution to the wind and try to get a woman elected POTUS. At least that would energize the base.

      • @CoggyMcFee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Wow, that is exactly the opposite expectation and take from me. If young people don’t show up to vote, I expect they’ll blame the DNC instead of themselves, even though the purpose of voting is getting the best outcome for your future and not about liking people or being sold on a brand.

    • @stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      689 months ago

      It’s a public repudiation in a way that is extraordinarily rare and highly symbolic. Nothing may change but shots have been fired across bows.

        • @Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          Fucking seriously…

          “We’re” stuck in the same stupid fucking mindset the founding morons were where they relied on shame and integrity when designing our government…

          We’re dealing with a party that only believes “might makes right” and we’re wagging our fingers at them as if they give a shit at all…

          • @lightnsfw@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            How they haven’t learned this lesson after 10 years of “OMG can you believe Trump did XXXXXX!” posts every single day I will never understand.

      • @Verito@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        69 months ago

        We’re well past it meaning anything. These rebukes, reprimands, and censures are political theater. Fascists laugh when you use the rigged system against them.

    • @Crikeste@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -79 months ago

      Would you like the capitalist who used to say the n word or the capitalist who used to say the n word? Please participate in democracy 🥺🥺🥺🥺 lmao

    • @derpgon@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      -109 months ago

      Oh it is a democracy, but not “direct democracy”. We don’t choose what happens, we just choose who decides what happens.

      Those in power bribe, threaten, and lie, and we can’t do shit about it because the actual hood guys end due to harassment or threats and can’t deal with it psychologically.

      • @finestnothing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        10
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Oh it is a democracy, but not “direct democracy”. We don’t choose what happens, we just choose who decides what happens.

        Still not a democracy, you just described a Republic, which is what we’ve always officially been even if die hard patriots prefer to say democracy

        Those in power bribe, threaten, and lie, and we can’t do shit about it because the actual hood guys end due to harassment or threats and can’t deal with it psychologically.

        Plutocracy in action

        • @TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          119 months ago

          Oh it is a democracy, but not “direct democracy”. We don’t choose what happens, we just choose who decides what happens.

          Still not a democracy, you just described a Republic, which is what we’ve always officially been even if die hard patriots prefer to say democracy

          What are you talking about? The people electing representatives that makes the final decisions is called “representative democracy”. A republic is a form of representative democracy. A constitutional monarchy, like you find a lot of in Europe, is another form of representative democracy that fit the original description, without being republics.

        • I think more than a few “patriots” feel the need to point out that we’re a republic, not a democracy.

          “Democracy isn’t the objective; liberty, peace, and prosperity are. We want the human condition to flourish. Rank democracy can thwart that.”

          Because the idea that people should get a say is ridiculous.

          It’s figuring out how to maintain dominance with a minority of support. And so, in that sense, I think the rhetoric is really telling. It’s a way of rationalizing the further entrenchment of minority rule.

          “Too much democracy” interferes with their plans.

        • @derpgon@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          59 months ago

          Either way, society is fucked until we got nothing left but to revolt - but that will never happen, as the carrot is being dangled all the time.

        • @sparkle@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          Cymraeg
          5
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          It’s a Republican Democracy… a Democratic Federal Republic… whatever you want to call it, point is it’s both a Republic and a Democracy. They’re not mutually exclusive categories. In fact, most categories you can use to describe the structure/type of a government aren’t very exclusive categories. Governments are very complex and can be a lot of different things, so we have a lot of different terms (and different usages of those terms) to narrow a description down.

  • tisktisk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    339 months ago

    Wasn’t trump impeached twice? What does this even mean concretely?
    Not knocking the sentiment, just questioning the practicality

    • @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      179 months ago

      Gives Dem voters something to rally around in the lead up to the election…

      Like. This is literally the time and place for performative actions, but I swear it’s like everyone’s forgot what the word “campaign” means.

    • Admiral Patrick
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Without getting too technical, and someone please correct anything that may be represented incorrectly: It’s basically like a trial. The House is the prosecutor, and jury and the Senate is the judge. The plaintiff is the United States itself, and the defendant is the political figure (president, SC justice, etc)

      The House gathers / presents evidence and tries them then renders a verdict (Impeachment)

      The Senate is responsible for sentencing or acquitting. Without a 2/3 majority voting to remove them from office, the impeached is acquitted.

      In both of Trump’s, the House found him guilty of the charges (impeached) but the Republican controlled Senate acquitted him.

      Hard to edit it in on mobile, but see @ricecake@sh.itjust.works 's clarifications below to my analogy.

      • @ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        79 months ago

        Impeachment is the decision to press charges, and the Senate trial is closer to the actual trial.

        “Charged and convicted” -> “impeached and convicted”

        Otherwise a perfectly good analogy. :)

        The distinction only matters for people who bring up due process concerns. The impeachment proceedings aren’t actually a trial, but a decision to have one, as such you aren’t obligated to the same ability to speak in your own defense as you would be at a proper trial. With the Senate trial there’s more expectation of due process because it’s an actual trial.

    • @Burstar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      79 months ago

      Unfortunately it means as much as it did for the Trump impeachments. There is zero chance any, let alone enough, Republicans would vote to convict these conservative judges regardless of the evidence and validity of the charge(s).

    • @S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -79 months ago

      It means nothing. It’s political theatre to distract from the party’s current issues.

  • @NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    269 months ago

    I wish there was a way to get rid of corrupt judges at the highest level that wasn’t a political process. I never understood the lifetime appointments anyway. It hasn’t done anything to keep them from being partisan.

    • @Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      109 months ago

      The American founders didn’t have good understanding of civil service type stuff back then. Coming from Britain there was a bureaucracy but if I’m remembering my history right it was mostly staffed by nobles who needed jobs and the overriding concern was that money should keep coming into the government. Especially from the colonies. This was actually part of the reason we ended up in a war for our independence. It may not have gone differently with a direct line, but we had to go through the undersecretary to the undersecretary to communicate with the British government. Which effectively made sure our concerns were never heard by the King until we petitioned him directly. Then he consulted his top advisor who also had not heard any concerns previously and they concluded the petition was worthless. To which we decided property destruction was the answer and cue the escalations.

      So what our founders wanted was an independent civil service, but they had no idea how to make one. They only knew about patronage systems. And the one lethal blow to any patronage system is to say you can hold this position for as long as you want, as long as you’re not corrupt. They knew it wasn’t perfect. And they openly said we should be holding Constitutional Conventions on the regular to improve on things like this. For the record the two competing models are to lean into partisanship and hold elections, or run the judiciary as a technocracy with limited sovereignty. So the judges would actually figure out the supreme court and lower courts themselves in that system. Much like our military does now.

      Both of those systems have their pros and cons but importantly, none of them stop determined ideological assaults on the institution. By the time you are hiring people it is too late to stop that. They’ve already been indoctrinated and they aren’t going to tell the truth about it publicly. (For example all the judges that overturned Roe v Wade, said it was settled law or something similar in their confirmation hearings. Then they flipped the literal second they had the majority on an abortion case.) You have to stop indoctrination at the source, in education. Which is why there’s such a huge push by conservative Christians to destroy public schools.

      Anyways that’s probably more than you wanted. TL;DR is it was the best system they had at the time, and they could not have foreseen fuckery like capping congress which obliterated the idea of actually representing the local views in a national body.

    • @deltapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      99 months ago

      There is. It’s illegal and it’s illegal to advocate for it, and it’s illegal to encourage someone else to do it. So I don’t wouldn’t do it, I don’t talk about it except in vague terms, and I don’t think you should do it either.

      • @sparkle@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        Cymraeg
        39 months ago

        but… the declaration of independence says we have a duty to do it! Surely the founding fathers would approve…

    • @Delusional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      79 months ago

      Yeah here we have clearly obviously openly corrupt judges deciding on the biggest decisions of the land and nothing can seemingly be done to fix it. The system is broken.

  • @barkingspiders@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    259 months ago

    Fantastic, I know this probably won’t go anywhere but this is the right thing to do regardless. SCOTUS needs to be held accountable to the American people for their actions. We grant them extraordinary power and that must come with extraordinary accountability. Holding them to a lower standard than any judge in a lesser court is ridiculous. The higher the court, the higher the standards should be.