• @Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    1639 months ago

    Again: do it. The sooner we can cast off the yoke of the Middle East’s hold on our power generation via oil, the better. Things like this can only accellerate the process: good. Keep it up and accellerate even more.

  • AllahOP
    link
    fedilink
    1119 months ago

    i am starting to think excessive rich people are not THAT good for society

      • Chainweasel
        link
        fedilink
        English
        219 months ago

        I know that no one is actually serious when they say this, but I think all it would take would be one.
        If we just drag Bezos or Musk out in the streets and have an actual barbecue with them I feel like the rest would start to support a wealth tax pretty fucking quickly.

        • @ChicoSuave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          109 months ago

          The rich would use the media to create a zombie style fear of the average person and sow paranoia to rouse security systems like police and national guard to action. They would lock down everyone rather than suffer losing one person.

          Keep in mind that eating just one rich isn’t as scary as the promise of eating more. The rich will use their their considerable resources, and cooperate, to stop them from succumbing to populist hunger.

    • @ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      19 months ago

      Money is not true value, currency is a placeholder for true value that is used to facilitate trade. Rich people are worth less than the profits they extract from coordinating labor. But they extract enough to think they’re still better than those they exploit.

  • Flying Squid
    link
    fedilink
    469 months ago

    We’ll see if Saudi Arabia’s attempt to control the West works this time. They sure do a good job with the U.S. despite being behind 9/11.

  • @Got_Bent@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    329 months ago

    Sell to whom? Do Euro bonds work differently than in the US?

    You can sell bonds in the US and it’s only slightly different from selling a stock. The bond changes hands, but the government debt and interest payments remain static. (The buyer and seller get to deal with premium/discounts and accrued interest, but that has zero effect on the underlying debt from the issuing government)

    I don’t understand why this would be a bad thing for them to sell.

      • sunzu
        link
        fedilink
        09 months ago

        I don’t see how KSA selling their bonds on secondary market will lower the “price” of new issue.

        • @iopq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Why would you buy the new issue that yields like crap when the older bonds that got dumped are much cheaper?

          The price of the bond and the yield are in an inverse relation. In other words, by dumping the bonds you increase their yield. Europe would be forced to pay a higher yield on new issues

          • @Got_Bent@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            39 months ago

            I mentioned premium/discount in my comment. When you sell a bond on the secondary market, the price goes up or down to match prevailing interest rates. It should have no effect on new issue prices.

            I am simplifying quite a bit here, but the gist is sufficient unless European bonds work differently which was my original question.

            • @notabot@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              49 months ago

              The price moves with supply and demand on the secondary market. Normally, yes, that’ll tend to vary to balance yield with the prevailing interest rates, however, the threat seems to be to dump bonds onto the secondary market, presumably without a minimum price. The glut would mean buyers could purchase them below that balance price, giving them a better yield. This would have (at least) two knock on effects, firstly it would make it harder for governments yo raise funds through bond issues as they’d effectively be competing with the cheaper ‘dumped’ bonds and so would need to offer an equivalently high yield, and secondly may allow ‘undesirable’ governments or groups to amass significant amounts of European debt, which potentially gives them more political leverage than European governments might like.

              • @Got_Bent@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                29 months ago

                A sensible response. Thank you. I couldn’t wrap my head around how this would affect the market, but yeah if the volume is big enough and the price is low enough it could muck things up.

              • sunzu
                link
                fedilink
                19 months ago

                It’s not clear how much European debt Saudi Arabia holds, but its central bank’s net foreign currency reserves stand at $445bn. Saudi Arabia holds $135.9bn in US treasuries, placing it 17th among investors in the US bonds.

                Best info on their holdings I could pull from fake news coverage. I am going to assume they hold less EU than US. So lets say 130billion.

                European sovereign bond issuance continues above pre-pandemic levels: in 2021, European sovereign bond issuance, including issuance from EU Member States, the UK and the European Commission, accumulated EUR 3362.3 bn in proceeds,

                Note that’s with a 3.3T

                I am not a bond trader so I am not sure how big of impact Saudi sell off would cause but for them to drive the price, they would be taking big losses on top of what is likely an underwater position.

                • @notabot@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  29 months ago

                  They may well be looking at how much the EU holds in Saudi assets, seeing those at potential risk of being seized and deciding tge write-down on dumping the bonds would be worth it. Long term, I don’t think it would have an effect on prices, but short term it may well do, depending on how concentrated their holdings are.

                  From what I can see, normal trading volume in bonds is about 500% per year, or about 2% per day assuming 250 trading days per year. If the 130bn you mention is spread across all government bonds across the EU then it accounts for about 4% of the total, or about two days of normal trade. Dump all of that in one go and it’d definitely have a short term effect. If their holdings are more concentrated they could have an even bigger effect on the bonds they hold.

                  Bonds tend to be issued on a regular basis, so even a short term drop in price could be timed to affect an auction. That has the twin effect of reducing the amount the government in question raises, and also tying them into effectively higher interest rates, potentially for decades to come.

                  I’m no expert trader either, so I could be barking up the wrong tree, but I assume that they would have a clear expectation of the results before making that threat, and I can’t really see any other effects it could be expected to have.

            • @iopq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              The prevailing interest rates is what is affected when a large holder dumps their bonds, it increases the market interest rates

            • sunzu
              link
              fedilink
              29 months ago

              It should have no effect on new issue prices.

              That is my understanding, short of KSA flooding secondary market to where nobody shows up at the auction but I doubt they got enough bonds to do this or that they would sell them in such manner anyway.

  • @vxx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    249 months ago

    Using bonds to blackmail the European Union? I hope they will be barred from buying bonds for all eternity.

  • OBJECTION!
    link
    fedilink
    -189 months ago

    If the Saudis disinvested from the dollar and started selling oil in yuan, it would severely weaken US soft power around the world. At the same time, seizing the assets would remove a bargaining chip from potential peace talks. And those assets likely wouldn’t be enough for Ukraine to win anyway.

    Turns out when you steal other countries’ assets (as with Venezuela), other countries stop trusting you with their money and start trusting other countries (like China) with it instead. If they wanna speedrun losing a second cold war, that’s the way to go.

        • @Num10ck@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          89 months ago

          the global market has decided that your whataboutisms are wrong. theres no currency on earth that is more reliable than the USD. it’s FAR from perfect to be fair, but it sets the bar.

          when there is a stablecoin that is worth trillions of dollars, things might change.