• @rglullis@communick.newsOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 year ago

      the idea that people will share your data benevolent right?

      Not necessarily. There are a good number of providers (e.g, Pinata, Infura) of “Pinning services”, which will host the data that you want to make sure it’s always available. At first sight, they might seem more expensive than just using something like S3, but if you consider that there is no egress costs for files on IPFS then it might end up a lot cheaper to host content there.

      • chiisana
        link
        fedilink
        English
        71 year ago

        If cost is a reason for concern, then the 5c/GB storage and 8c/GB egress on Pinata isn’t exactly cheaper than S3’s 2.7c/GB storage and 9c/GB egress. You can get much better mileage with something like Backblaze B2 0.6c/GB storage free egress, and couple with CloudFlare or other CDN for much lower egress (often free).

        • @rglullis@communick.newsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 year ago

          Sure there will be cheaper alternatives (Storj is $0.04 GB stored + $0.007 GB egress), but with IPFS you can e.g, seed from your own home server and not becoming a bottleneck.

      • @Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        Feels like your services there just makes http links with extra steps?

        Why would I want to use IPFS with those services instead of just online hosting?

    • Mubelotix
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes. That’s also how torrents work, and they allow anyone to download any movie in the world. Html files are small, you don’t need to share much

        • Mubelotix
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          Well it’s designed for the web so it’s better at handling relatively small files. But yeah, it would work