• @givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2022 months ago

    Meanwhile, American users are flocking to RedNote because authorities have worked themselves into a lather over privacy concerns about TikTok, while U.S. tech giants harvest user data with industrial efficiency. The difference? American data collection is done for profit, and Chinese data collection is done for control. Pick your poison.

    Hard to argue Zuck and Elon don’t want control either…

      • ElderReflections
        link
        fedilink
        232 months ago

        “In this country, you gotta make the money first. Then when you get the money, you get the power. Then when you get the power, then you get the women.”

        • @Mac@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Then, when all your desires are fullfilled, you realize that your life is empty because nobody around you actually gives a shit about you and are only using you as a connection to money and/or power. You end up a soulless husk of a human being whose only goal in life is line go up.

        • @taladar@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          42 months ago

          Honestly, if they all stopped trying to get more money or power at the point where they have all the women and luxuries they could ever want it would be a vast improvement over the status quo at this point.

        • @humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Then when you get the power, then you get the women.”

          Then when you get the power you tell the plebs to make more money. “This is America. If you don’t make more money (for me), you’re a douchebag”.

            • merde alors
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -22 months ago

              not necessarily, again

              destruction may be the result of failure to control or even resistance to control. Why all these generalizations? There are so many variables in uncountably different situations.

          • merde alors
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -22 months ago

            some profit from things getting out of control

            some give up on profit to have control (you may say that control is their profit, but i’m taking profit literally.

    • OBJECTION!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      272 months ago

      Isn’t it the exact opposite? The only thing China can do with my data is try to sell me stuff. Meanwhile, the authorities in my own country have the power to kick in my door and drag me away to some blacksite.

      If I were Chinese, I would rather the US government have my data than the Chinese government, but since I’m American, I would rather the Chinese government have it than the US. Pretty much everyone anywhere in the world ought to regard their own government as their highest security risk.

      • @WhatSay@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        82 months ago

        The only thing China can do with my data is try to sell me stuff.

        Anyone that collects your data could use it for many legal and illegal activities. If you see it only as marketing, you are not imagining the possibilities of stolen identity, fraud, blackmail, etc.

      • @SoJB@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -19
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Liberals: MUH SENSORSHIP NOOOOO

        Reality: every U.S. leftist content creator has been physically visited by FBI agents and have a file maintained on them, despite never once making a threat or call to violence.

        Meanwhile, China has lifted hundreds of millions out of crushing poverty and built the world’s best high speed rail system, only in the last 10-15 years.

        And they make fun of Xi and criticize their government just fine.

        Every accusation liberals make is a confession. Really weird how they keep acting indistinguishable from literal Nazis while accusing the left of doing the same thing.

        Oh look, there it is again. Libs just can’t stop taking Ls.

        • @RidderSport@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          62 months ago

          And yet China is basically the same as the USA will be in a few years. A hypercapitalist country (under the disguise of communism) that caters to the already rich, with incredibly authotarian methods that funds its wealth largely by overexpenditure of the state.

          Sure many Chinese have profited, but many have been deliberately thrown under the bus, even more so now with record-high youth unemployment and homelessness. Sure they’ve build a lot of good infrastructure, though it’s debatable whether the quality is any good, but that was done to fund companies and fill the pockets of corrupt politicians and their buddies.

          China should not be an example of a good social state to anyone.

        • @Geobloke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          and they make fun of Xi and criticise their government just fine <

          Did you forget about Hong Kong already? What happened to 50 years of " One Country - Two Systems"

    • @coherent_domain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      26
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How do people not think that China is also a hyper capitalistic society, especially in the tech sector. Your data is 100% being sold if you are on any Chinese platform, just like in the U.S.

      If anything, Chinese big tech tends to be less privacy-respecting than the west, because they don’t need to operate in area with basic privacy laws, like Europe and California; and there are much less alternative products to choose from because of the GFW.

      The founder and CEO of Baidu openly stated that “Chinese people are less sensitive about privacy, which gives us more data to work with” See https://m.163.com/dy/article/DDRTB01Q0511FQO9.html?spss=adap_pc

      • @taladar@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        72 months ago

        They all operate under the same laws in any given area. And neither respect your privacy if not forced by laws that are actually enforced.

    • @ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      132 months ago

      The difference? American data collection is done for profit, and Chinese data collection is done for control. Pick your poison.

      No the difference is that these US companies give the US government a backdoor into everyone’s data (while also harvesting it all for profit) while the Chinese apps don’t in favor of giving the Chinese government a backdoor into everyone’s data. They don’t give a shit about propaganda and brainwashing occurring which is why they’ll allow the app to stay up in the US just so long as it’s an American company controlling it here because then they can install their backdoor for the US government.

      • @SoftTeeth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        22 months ago

        And all of this social media shit is a distraction from real problems in the world. This is what our government does to run out the clock and prevent meaningful change.

        Unfortunately nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

    • kid2908OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      122 months ago

      The article talks about how America is mirroring China’s tactic. So yeah, now they want control too.

    • @takeda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      92 months ago

      This is crystal clear now, but it was less clear before.

      I started saying that social media finally figured out how to monetize the platform and it’s customers aren’t people, aren’t even companies, the customers are now billionaires and foreign governments.

    • @samus12345@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      42 months ago

      Yeah, this may have been true before the upcoming administration, but Trump’s government (which will be a full-blown oligarchy) absolutely wants Chinese/Russian style control over its citizens.

  • @Rottcodd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    622 months ago

    The only winners in this scenario are governments that want more control over their citizens’ digital lives.

    And that, as the saying goes, is not a bug. It’s a feature.

    • @CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      82 months ago

      Man I wish European governments would take more control of our digital town squares that are entirely owned and handled by foreign corporations who seek to erode democracy.

  • don
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    Anyone that knows anything about average TT users knew that if the ban was going to happen, that this was going to happen in some way, shape, or form.

  • @DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    62 months ago

    I’m pretty sure Xiao Hong Shu translates to Little Red Note in English. I’m not using it, just clarifying the name to make it seem small / cute. Aduki beans are Xiao hong dou.

    • umami_wasabi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      23
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      First of all, the name doesn’t translate to “Little Red Note”, but “Little Red Book.”

      Second, Little Red Book is literally the nickname of a Chinese political publication called Quotations from Chairman Mao Tse-tung.

      Sorry, that name isn’t cute at all.

        • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          72 months ago

          I think most people know it too. They protest because they have already got hacked a dozen or two times, advertisers steal all data not locked down, and the government scoops up all of that. So they question “what can China do to me that hasn’t already been done. My data and privacy has already been made worthless”

          • @Krauerking@lemy.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            12 months ago

            Yeah I hear a lot of people asking why it matters if someone has their data cause it must be worthless by now.
            I often think the governments wouldn’t be fighting this hard to track people if it was.

      • OBJECTION!
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s actually just a funny coincidence, though it’s funny when people freak out about it. Mao’s “little red book” is written 红宝书, while the app is 小红书, so the connection is only really there in English. Red is a reference to two institutions the creator was involved with, Stanford Business School and Bain & Company, both of which use red as their main color (I imagine the general association of red with good luck may have factored in as well). As for note vs book, I mean, a notebook is a “little book,” and note is short for notebook (e.g. Death Note).

        If you actually look at the app and what gets posted there and what doesn’t, it’s pretty silly to assume it’s a reference. It was originally called “Hong Kong Shopping Guide” and was targeted towards tourists, the userbase skews female and relatively well off. It’s like Instagram, there’s lots of cat posts and the the like, lots of fashion, I’ve come across some pretty impressive furries, and it’s even got a decent sized queer community, particularly popular with lesbians.

        Even if it were an intentional reference to Mao’s book, like, so what? The users are the ones putting out content and they’re just regular people. Not everything is some sinister plot.

  • @jpreston2005@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -22 months ago

    What has social media like tiktok or whatever done to improve peoples lives?

    Man, just use Lemmy and stay off those toxic apps. I’ve had multiple people send me tiktok links and guess what, that shit stays unclicked. I want no part of it.

    • DigitalDilemma
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      A lot of people have made it their main income. Whether you or I think that’s good or not is irrelevent, but it does mean hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions, of Americans will lose their jobs as a result of this.

      • @jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -12 months ago

        I have just as much sympathy for those poor individuals as I would for health insurance employees that would lose their job as a result of U.S. universal healthcare. Well, a little bit more, as they at least made people smile on occasion.