• @whalebiologist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    664 months ago

    I compared Bee’s version of my day with my diary entry. I wrote about trying Paddington Bear-themed marmalade sandwiches in our office kitchen. (Not a fan. I did, however, note that the strawberry-flavored shortbread cookie was excellent.) I wrote several paragraphs about a sensitive text conversation I had with a friend. Bee never picked up these moments because memorable things aren’t always spoken aloud. It made me wonder: in a hypothetical future where everyone has a Bee, do unspoken memories simply not exist?

    I liked reading this part because I had not considered that consumers of these products would have an expectation of their device to document their thoughts.

    • @dzsimbo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      144 months ago

      It makes sense though, doesn’t it? I imagine someone going in knowing it’s machine learning doesn’t have too many false assumptions, but they are being programmed in a way to mimic humans. The voice recognition part has come an incredible long way and I would not be surprised that this makes the uninitiated expect more of the language model than actually is there.

      In this era of atomic isolation, even I wanted to believe it’s true. Having an algorithm that remembers my name through reboots would deepen the sense that there is a pretty developed entity helping me. Luckily I skimp on the premium versions.

  • @SeeFerns@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    304 months ago

    So it listens to you and you can “permit it” to read emails and all that shit? I didn’t even know this kind of thing existed let alone that anyone would CHOOSE to allow this. Crazy.

  • Rose56
    link
    fedilink
    English
    20
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    I find it stupid yet somehow helpful.
    It records everything you say, it also takes your time after to read the scripts, which could can be helpful at some point.
    It’s a no from me.

    • Sundray
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      I think the Borg would take one look at me and declare me a total loss.

  • @happydoors@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    134 months ago

    I like how they put in italics “it listens to all your conversations” and yet it’s still third in the list. Reminds me of how most mass media approach mass surveillance!

  • @Allero@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    134 months ago

    I outsourced my memory to an AI pin

    This part is enough to ensure things are gonna get dystopian real quick. Spoiler: they do, and the thing also fails a lot.

    • L3ft_F13ld!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      54 months ago

      A Firefox fork like IronFox with an aggressive adblocker setup like uBlock Origin in medium mode blocks paywalls and all kinds of annoying popups on most sites. Takes a bit of tweaking to not break some sites, but after that it’s amazing.

    • @parmesan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      other people have made good suggestions as well but I use Bypass Paywalls Clean as a Firefox add-on and it works great

    • Bilb!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      I don’t think writers should be paid either. We have AI to do all writing now anyway, so what do we need writecels for anyway? 😏

      • @Sibyls@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34 months ago

        That’s not the responsibility of the end user. That’s the responsibility of the host. If you’re going to have people write your articles, pay them.

            • @lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -14 months ago

              As someone else mentioned, ads are becoming less profitable. Particularly in light of the whole data collection biz, I’m starting to regard paywalls as a more “honest” type of monetisation. In a perfect world, they wouldn’t need to do either, and maybe there are better options, but I don’t fault them for it.

              • @Sibyls@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                24 months ago

                That’s a fair opinion. I could never imagine contracting someone to put content on my website, then making my end users pay to even see that content just so I can ensure I can pay my writers, knowing it drives most traffic away. An ethical and intelligent website host would ensure more consistent and effective ways of bringing in income, which is their responsibility.

                We live in a digital age where most of everything on the internet is free. Putting your site behind a paywall is a surefire way to ensure your website will receive less traffic in this day and age, but to each to their own.

    • dantheclamman
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -44 months ago

      Journalists need to be paid. Ad revenue is in freefall, and it never really supported long form content that doesn’t endorse a product. If you want real news, it has to be paid for somehow.