In Bookwyrm there are way too many duplicate authors and books, and a way to merge them is unclear.

Open Library seems to offer a more unified and consistent database.

  • @tofu@lemmy.nocturnal.garden
    link
    fedilink
    English
    137 days ago

    I think they have different use cases. OL may have a more consistent library, but Bookwyrm has the (social) features im looking for in a book app.

    Personally I add books to OL and then import to BW.

    • Remy Rose
      link
      fedilink
      English
      66 days ago

      Oh wow, I never thought to do it that way, but it makes so much sense! Thanks for the tip

  • caos
    link
    fedilink
    English
    87 days ago

    Open Library is the main data source for Bookwyrm for book data. Bookwyrm is an application in the Fediverse that can be used to find and write reviews of books. I wouldn’t see that as a contradiction.

  • Carighan Maconar
    link
    fedilink
    English
    47 days ago

    Considering who is behind it, I just use Open Library. In particular because like you say, their actual data is much more useful.

      • Carighan Maconar
        link
        fedilink
        English
        9
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        Other way around. Open Library is part of the internet archive. Given it’s also vastly superior in quality and has tools to maintain and administrate the data, I very much prefer it over alternative offerings. If Bookwyrm at least had a curation/maintainence team or support group or something, and not everyone could just nilly-willy add duplicates of existing entries, then I could see more use for it.

        But like others have said, it’s also a bit of a different use case. If you want to pull data, definitely do it from OL. They’re the same source Bookwyrm uses for its main data import, after all.

  • FundMECFS
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    I agree it is really annoying (the duplication issue). Have devs thought of a solution?. You can manually sort of merge by adding multiple ISBN’s together but it isn’t a proper workaround.

    Would be better to have multiple instances of the same book possibly, but the reviews get merged?