

I wonder if a user agent spoofer would get around that?
I wonder if a user agent spoofer would get around that?
It really depends on tone and how long the interaction would last. I’d consider saying that rude most of the time as the person making small talk is just doing something nice.
I’m not exactly sure how to respond to that.
Yes
The only thing I build from source on a normal basis is LMMS because there’s some features on main you just can’t get anywhere else. For example, the slicer that comes with LMMS nightly isn’t in the builds, and particularly recently someone pushed a commit that allows for resizing of the slicer, so I just had to pull that and build it.
This sounds amazing! I will also put here there’s also chronometer that has a lot of the same functionality as fitnesspal but without the subscription, but you have to use an account.
I still don’t get it
Dumb question but is that a real command line tool
Sweet - I didn’t realize that malware is tailored for one OS usually, but that makes a lot more sense.
This is great I really appreciate it :)
I love you so much. Never change
The article made a few good points, but a good amount of it was conjecture. I liked the part about comparing the two functions and showing that exceptions are faster but I think a big thing he’s not getting is readability. Even in the functions he showed, you can directly see that the one using std::expected has the happy path and error path directly in the function signature, whereas the exception one doesn’t.
As for the “error kind” trap he was talking about, that definitely exists, but ignores the fact that you can also get this same kind of error from exceptions. I’ve definitely gotten exceptions that I didn’t understand from Python or Java libraries, but it’s not a problem with exceptions but a problem with how they’re shown. If there’s nothing to tell me that I should have thought of that error, it shouldn’t be an expectation for a dev to have thought of it.
Before scraping I would verify that there is no HTTP API that you can use to craft requests instead of scraping from the website. These might be higher quality than what you can scrape. If there is no easy to use http API, go to scraping then. I would generally consider scraping the last option, unless it’s a ridiculously easy website to scrape.
I heard there are quantum computing libraries in Python if that interests you!
If I were you I’d browse PyPi for any packages that look cool.
I’m not exactly sure what to think about it, but I do like how there’s specific things that have their implementation in code right there. I did only look at the site for like a minute, so take that with a grain of salt.
I know it’s a dumb idea but imagine how fun it would be if there was no copyright
This is also a great alternative to syncing photo albums between devices instead of syncing with the cloud.
Why isn’t syncthing there? Is there something bad with it I’m not aware of amor are they just not aware of it?
You can make nice little self watering pots with a 3d printer and the right filament.
Those extending swords are really fun.
There are also 3d puzzles you can make.
You can also print models you’d like to paint as minis. You just need the model, sandpaper, primer and some paint.
This is hard to say without knowing the use of the scripts. If it’s something to be used as normal CLI tools, probably some place that’s in the user’s path. If it’s something else, I would just have it download to the current working directory so that the user has the choice on where to put it.