I’ve read it, but I don’t really understand the legal issue. I’m also not sure what could be illegal about VSCodium. It uses the Open VSX store for downloading extensions (but not every extension is on there).

It would certainly be better if VSCode was under a Copyleft license, so that it couldn’t be turned into proprietary software and maybe that way addons would also have to be Free Software, like in Blender. But Microsoft clearly doesn’t want that.

I’m not much against having repositories with plugins, extensions or whatever BUT they should be like Debian, you can just pack everything into images / a folder and use offline for ever when required.

Yeah, that’s a good idea. They could also just be added to Debian, which would solve this problem, but there also would be another benefit for me. Most people don’t care about that, but I want to only use Free Software. When I install something from Debian’s free repository, I don’t have to worry that it might be proprietary, because they only allow Free Software there. I don’t have this certainty when installing software from most other places.

Same goes for modern Docker powered solutions and JavaScript frameworks.

Some JavaScript frameworks and libraries seem to be packaged in Debian. But most people use NPM, of course.

Speaking about VSCode it is also open-source until you realize that 1) the language plugins that you require can only compiled and run in official builds of VSCode and 2) Microsoft took over a lot of the popular 3rd party language plugins, repackage them with a different license… making it so if you try to create a fork of VSCode you can’t have any support for any programming language because it won’t be an official VSCode build. MS be like :).

I’m opposed to having repositories for plugins. I don’t want my code editor to connect to the internet at all. If I need some popular plugin, it should already be available in the repository of the distro that I’m using. Some distributions of VIM and Emacs download a bunch of plugins on launch from who knows where. I don’t get why people are fine with that.

It’s similar with Flatpak and Snap. Oh and each programming language has its own package manager too, of course (NPM belongs to Microsoft too, btw). Everyone and everything wants its own package manager or a separate distribution system.

For now I use VSCodium in firejail to prevent it from accessing the network and I don’t install new plugins. I haven’t heard of any better editor, unfortunately.

Can I start with Gentoo or is that too easy?

I would say that security and privacy are also very important. That’s something you can’t get with Windows.

Congratulations! Next you might want to learn about the Free Software movement: https://youtu.be/Ag1AKIl_2GM

So, yeah, sell me on Linux, please.

Windows has spyware, so that should be enough reason to not use it for someone like you. You will have to spend some time to learn GNU/Linux, but for most office tasks it shouldn’t be difficult, especially if you are good with computers. Most popular distros already come with a PDF viewer and Libre Office, so it should be able to do almost everything you want out of the box. VLC player can play all common video types and is easy to install. Libre Office might have issues with some Word documents though, so you might need to look into that. A web browser (usually Firefox) and probably some email client will be preinstalled as well.

You might need to check if your printer and scanner will be supported out of the box or if extra drivers from the manufacturer are needed (then check if they are available on their website). I think printers will probably work fine out of the box, but scanners might require extra drivers (this depends on the model - there are models that don’t).

If you need more motivation, look into the Free Software movement: https://youtu.be/Ag1AKIl_2GM

GNOME also has an app that lets you do encrypted incremental backups very easily.

It is possible to be entertaining and ethical at the same time. Someone else will take their place.

I would venture that the majority of people see it as an investment of one sort or another. I think the insane market cap, and the devestating effect the recent crash had on its reputation and use, are evidence of that.

You are right, but it doesn’t matter what most people think. I mean we should educate them about it, but their opinion is irrelevant.

Most cryptos have fundamental problems that I don’t see being fixed, eg it’s deflationary properties, BTC’s wasteful PoW, ETH skirting/crossing the boundary of being a security, etc.

Etherum has already switched from proof of work algorithm to less wasteful proof of stake. So it seems that at least that problem can be solved.

This is like the one thing they are good for, and Monero is the best at it. This is an arguable point though, others may say that this is a negative due to the implications and governments have cracked down on privacy enhancing tools like Tornado Cash for this reason. I personally value privacy to an extent, but do not see the need in my life to use Monero. I certainly wouldn’t fault you for using it, though.

You should be able to buy any of the popular cryptocurrencies anonymously. They won’t make your payment history private like Monero does, but you will still be anonymous when paying.

I think adoption has stagnated. And look at El Salvador, they basically had to force crypto on the populace and they use their own proprietary wallet, nullifying privacy benefits. And again, it is treated as an investment by the government there who are buying BTC to speculate.

I don’t know exact stats, but it’s bigger than I expected before I started looking into it. There are a lot of crypto ATMs now in cities, which you can see at https://coinatmradar.com. There are also some stores and restaurants that accept crypto, especially in the US (https://coinmap.org/view). You can also find some online services on https://cryptwerk.com. El Salvador is certainly messed up. Bitcoin probably isn’t even a good choice, because of its big transaction fees. Other cryptocurrencies are faster, can handle more transactions and have smaller fees.

Yeh this is dependant on your country. Here in Australia every crypto transaction is a capital gains event 🙄

Damn, that’s crazy. So you can’t even buy something without paying an extra tax?

No problem, take your time :).

Sure, both of which are more straightforwardly useful tools for financial crimes than a phone is, and less generally useful for other purposes.

I guess phones are better for spying people.

Good for you? But many, many people are getting scammed…some directly through the technology itself.

Technology doesn’t scam people, it’s not alive. People get scammed in all areas of life, regardless of technology they use. It’s ridiculous that I have to explain this again.

Crypto is so popular and useful for criming that ransomware is practically a first order use case for it.

I doubt it, but it’s irrelevant. Criminals use many things that ordinary people also use.

I guess? Makes it pretty useless as a payment method then.

Not really. There is a difference between giving someone your money vs paying for a service. But you know this. It’s silly that you keep saying things like that. It just makes you look stupid or dishonest. There are many real things you could criticize about cryptocurrency and I would agree with you on many of them. There is no need to make stuff up.

My first advice would be to not exchange dollars you need for digital junk that may become worthless, stolen, or forgotten.

Right, only cryptocurrency could become worthless, stolen or forgotten. Paper junk can’t.

A phone is a communication device…crypto isn’t.

Correct. It’s a currency and payment method.

What society? The global society? Crypto isn’t just scamming people here in the US, but in every place crypto is used.

Crypto isn’t scamming anyone. Scammers are doing it in multiple countries. I am not being scammed by using crypto.

A common method of money laundering is to sink money from ill-gotten gains into a volatile asset that can be said to either appreciate or depreciate in value to fuzz the numbers. Crypto is at least a reasonable tool for the job.

Make sense. I think converting all of it to regular money might be difficult, but I’m not that familiar with how those criminals operate.

I think this is an easy thing to say about lots of things. But schools have enough trouble teaching kids to read in this country…which I think would be a prerequisite to figuring out whether the Internet weirdo you’re transferring your PooCoin™ to is a real deal “PooHead” or a scammer looking to scam people.

The first advice would be to not transfer your coin to anyone. Changing the education would certainly be difficult and there are many more important things that should be taught first. Like critical thinking, the ability to find and verify information, the scientific method. Technology is just another one of those things.

They were fine with Linus investing in companies and then reviewing their products or competing products and I don’t see that as a result of sloppiness. They haven’t even addressed it in their apology video.

Also moving too fast is not a valid excuse for misleading millions of people for years.

That’s sad. I hope that the company fails and they get hired somewhere else.

It’s akin IMO to saying that guns are the root of the problem with gun violence in America to say that crypto is the root of the problem with crypto scams.

I’m pretty sure there are states with very little gun violence. But regardless, crypto is not the only technology where scams happen. Many scams happen through a phone, but it wouldn’t make sense to blame phones for this. We could get rid of phones and even though I hate them, it would be a ridiculous solution even to me.

The type and frequency of these scams just isn’t possible using any other technology.

Maybe, but many scams don’t require much use of technology. For example multi-level marketing is a pyramid scheme, which is completely legal in the US.

I think crypto is perfect tooling for scams, ponzis, money laundering, confidence schemes, ransomware, fraud, and the transfer of dark money.

That’s because of lack of regulation and education in our society, but I agree. I’m only not sure about money laundering. Most crypto exchanges require identification and have limits. So I’m not sure how much it helps the more serious criminals, who need to withdraw significant amounts of money.

It’s not good tooling for quick payments between people (which are is more easily possible through paypal, venmo, etc.) and it is not particularly good for online payments for the type of goods most people purchase online either. It may be (as you say) one of the only semi-private ways to conduct online transactions, but I have not encountered anyone in my life who regularly required such a thing.

Waiting 40 minutes for a payment to go through might not always be a big deal to people, but yeah faster and more convenient methods exist. Most people don’t care about privacy, so they will just use the most convenient method. Just like they use WhatsApp for messaging.

As you state, the understanding and adoption of new technology is already a hurdle for most people, and crypto adoption requires you to not only be good at technology, but also have a good understanding of finance and financial instruments. The number of people who are experts (or have even advanced knowledge) in both areas is infinitesimal, and that’s a large part of the reason why scams run amok in this area, some even amongst those creating or deploying the technologies themselves. The overwhelming majority of people simply do not meaningfully understand either thing separately, and definitely don’t fully understand the intersection of the two.

You don’t need to be good at finance to use cryptocurrency for payments. I certainly am not. Being good at technology helps of course, but I doubt that every cryptocurrency user is. There are tutorials for non-technical people. I think things like that should be taught at schools though. It would be harder to mislead people then.

Good point, they can’t change who Linus is. But then I don’t understand why Luke and others would stay there for years and continue working with that guy, continue to take part in unethical behavior. It makes me think that it just didn’t bother them enough.

Linus is not the only one to blame. The people who work there could have done something to stop the unethical behavior or quit. But some of them stayed there for years and enabled Linus. I can’t look at those people and not think that they aren’t incompetent or corrupt.

What they did should be the standard. Serious reviewers should check on each others work and point out errors on regular basis. It’s the only way to stop corrupt/incompetent reviewers from misleading people.

But Steve didn’t contact Linus to give him time to prepare an explanation in which he would blame everyone else and say how sad he is! It’s just a poor $100M company, they are just humans and they make mistakes. :D

They have been misleading millions of people for years and getting away with it. I hope this company is done. There have to be consequences for this kind of behavior.

What Gamers Nexus did should be the standard. Serious reviewers should check on each others work and point out errors on regular basis. It’s the only way to get rid of corrupt channels like Linus Tech Tips and I suspect they were just one of many.