How is that not the onion?

I can finally buy some of these games now. Gee, thanks Sony you stupid pricks.

They live in Texas, they likely don’t have the funds.

Written by someone that lives in texas.

Fucking eggs are 8 dollars a dozen here. We don’t buy them now.

Make a bot that viscously rips Into people based off their username lol

But for real, nice. I get by with kobold for my uses. How far do you think you’ll take this?

k

I heard he got a rat penis transplant since lizard dick wasn’t cutting it anymore.

Hot take, who cares if it’s mildly emotional as long as it delivers the truth. The issue with sensationalism is that it usually hides the truth, lies, or tells half truths. If the facts are all right there, who care?

To be fair, these were better than the previous standards.

Not big enough. I want to carry a 55’’ “mobile” gaming device with me. Make it bigger!

I don’t particularly like the term Silencer. They are not silent, not even close, at least not the ones you just slap on to the end of the barrel.

They make the gun a little quieter as long as you use subsonic ammunition, quiet enough to likely not need hearing pro. Should still use that anyways, but still. These things won’t make it so your 007ing or Wick in the subway.

Skill issue. The local library in my home town does a readalong every weekend and a bunk fund every month.

For fun, I used this idea in chatgpt using similar logic:

Hello, can you explain to me how a strict profit generated number would result in a specific goal, such as if I make 1000 dollars I would suddenly be capable of owning a house. I find the idea strange and backwards.

You’re correct to find this idea odd—it reflects a misunderstanding of how financial goals, like owning a house, relate to income. Here’s why this thinking is flawed:

1. Profit vs. Net Worth: Making $1,000 in profit doesn’t directly equate to being able to afford a house because buying a house requires not just income but also savings, creditworthiness, and a down payment. Profit is only a small piece of the puzzle.

2. Costs and Expenses: Owning a house involves more than just the purchase price. You need to consider closing costs, property taxes, maintenance, and potentially ongoing mortgage payments. $1,000 would likely not be enough to cover even a fraction of these.

3. Leverage and Financing: Most people don’t buy houses outright; they use loans or mortgages. To secure a mortgage, lenders look at your total financial picture: income, savings, debt, and credit score. Simply generating $1,000 won’t improve these factors significantly.

4. Specificity of the Goal: “Making $1,000” is a general financial milestone, not a specific strategy tailored to the requirements of owning a home. A more actionable goal would involve budgeting, saving for a down payment, and improving credit.

5. The Backwards Logic: The idea that reaching an arbitrary profit threshold suddenly makes you eligible for something like owning a house conflates short-term gains with long-term financial stability. A better approach is to reverse-engineer the goal: start by determining the total cost of the house, then work backwards to figure out how much you need to save monthly, how much income you need to earn, and what steps are required to secure financing.

Example of Goal-Oriented Thinking:

If you wanted to own a $200,000 house:

You might need a 10% down payment ($20,000).

Closing costs could add $5,000–$10,000.

Monthly income would need to support a mortgage payment (let’s say $1,200/month).

Steps would include saving regularly, reducing debt, and improving credit, rather than focusing on an isolated profit milestone like $1,000.

Summary:

Focusing on a single, arbitrary profit number like $1,000 doesn’t align with the comprehensive planning required for significant financial goals like home ownership. Instead, success depends on a holistic view of your finances and structured goal-setting.

You have missed the point entirely with this silly anti-conspiracy nonsense.

I saw the original message, you should have read further lol.

I betcha the server the AI ceo is hosted on can be shot up.

Fine I’ll just tell people to Duckduckgo it! /s

Jokes aside I agree with this message. Better to give at least a basic idea on where to find something, or just don’t be a pedantic cock and give me the damn link, your word is not good enough okay buddy, pal, friend.

In action movie hero scenarios, they are usually police, military, or some sort of special operator where such a device or safety would be counter intuitive. Real life has no such issues if you are a civilian. (I know ACAB, just setting the scene.)

I think they hit peak evil, as I cannot discern which is worse. :(

Well, hopefully the survivors and the many people who fought for their freedom will do their best to ensure such horrible things never happen again. It’s truly scary how easy it seems to have monsters in power.

Oh wow, that’s… I couldn’t imagine being capable of following such an order, to toss a toddler into prison. Bastard leaders get bastard followers, I guess.