He wants to be the first trillionaire. This is the way.

If you build it, they will porn.

feddit.uk represent! Best inna worl’! Oo are ya, oo are ya? Come an’ 'ave a go if you think yer’ardinuff!

And so forth, I’m sure you get the general gist.

Every PC I’ve ever owned has had some version of vi installed on it pretty much on day one of my owning it.

I mean, I don’t disagree with anything you say, but that’s because I have a progressive mindset. Which kind of was the point.

Yes, I agree.

But surely you can acknowledge the possibility that some people believe transgenderism is an affront to god and an existential threat to children, or whatever, then their position is not dissimilar.

That’s the issue. What makes ‘this is offensive’ more valid than ‘this is dangerous’?

This is just another front in the war between religion and reason.

I mean it’s not an easy question to answer is it? How is my ideological position that ‘nigger’ is not acceptable and removing it makes the book suitable for modern readers any different from someone else’s ideological position that, e.g., ‘transgender’ is not acceptable and removing it makes whatever book suitable for modern readers?

A punchier example would be And Then There Were None by Agatha Christie - the best selling murder mystery of all time - which was first published as Ten Little Niggers

I don’t have a huge amount of respect for recruiters having been involved with them on both sides of the hiring process.

It often feels like they treat it like a numbers game - minimise effort by just throwing enough resumes at a job and hoping one will stick and then earn an easy cut. That will earn them more than seriously trying to match candidates with jobs.

Listen to this guy 'cos he ain’t fucking wrong. It’s grifts, all the way down.

Okay. But dogs CAN look up!

I’m not Italian, but I am a Fat Balding Idiot so we’re all good.

“Yes, I am untouchable, the cops can’t do jack sh—”

Love this format.

… in case England attacks again.

I have been thinking about coming over there with a cricket bat.

I’ve been using Qwant for a while now. Better results than Google, that’s for sure.

I’m still not sure what a project manager contributes.

I’ve well over a decade in software project management. The number one thing we contribute to a project is saying to the client (internal or external) “Sure, we can add that feature but it will have an impact on the delivery timeline unless we deprioritise other features. Are you happy for us to extend the deadline? If not, let’s talk about what we can cut from the existing scope in favour of your new feature.”

Same. I’d have assumed a single day.

Sir, yes sir!

Is Google really as shit as Bing? I had to Ask Jeeves to confirm that.