My accounts on other instances: @Machefi@lemm.ee @Machefi@szmer.info

  • 3 Posts
  • 6 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 23rd, 2023
  • MachefitoFediverse@lemmy.world•The Fediverse is Not The Future of The Internet.English
    2•2 years ago

    Regarding voting, of course, it should be done after familiarizing oneself with the post to some degree greater than the title.

    I meant changing people’s minds. While just the title won’t convince people to think a certain way, it will remain in their minds as one of many opinions on the topic they encountered. And it’s a shame if that opinion is the opposite of what the author has in mind.

  • MachefitoFediverse@lemmy.world•The Fediverse is Not The Future of The Internet.English
    29•2 years ago

    A small reminder that clickbaity titles like this work against the author’s view for all the people who read just the title and scroll further. (And they’re not to blame. You can’t read everything)

    TL;DR of the article:

    Fall of Twitter and Reddit helped the Fediverse grow. Most users don’t know or care how Federation works and don’t realise the necessity of donations. Fediverse either remains niche or becomes mainstream, the future is not set in stone.

  • MachefitoFediverse@lemmy.world•Tame your inner dictator!English
    3•2 years ago

    Defederating “from this and that” is actually sometimes problematic here. It’s about instance admins finding balance between freedom and usability (limiting spam and hate). Beehaw.org defederated from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, lemmy.world defederated from exploding-heads.com etc. These decisions were controversial, but they weren’t bold. On the contrary, much thought and care went into these and that can be seen in communities’ support for them (in case of Beehaw, along with hopeful awaiting of refederation by users and admins alike).

    But that seems not to be the main issue you’re presenting. Defederating from Threads specifically is an entirely different matter. And people who advocate for it, including myself, have more arguments for it than just privacy.

    Though it's not the main point of my comment, I'm gonna list some such arguments, simply to back my words.
    • The EEE. Meta could (and quite probably will) try to federate with its millions of users, then use extended protocols putting pressure on Fediverse to adapt, in order to satisfy Meta’s users. They can make it difficult to keep up (e.g. by providing purposely flawed documentation) and the users will grow tired of stuff not working here but working there. Once users register with Meta (since it’s a part of the Fediverse after all, right?), they’ll cut the rest of us loose.
    • Badly moderated content. Facebook is already full of it.
    • Meta has a history of terrible actions and should not be supported.