I vote for the new name to be Margot Linux.
She/Her, Also @MargotRobbie@lemmy.world
Academy Award nominated character actress, clown psychiatrist, Duchess of Bay Ridge, and plastic doll.
She is all of us, yet I’m not her, but sometimes I play her on TV.
So what will be my ending?
I vote for the new name to be Margot Linux.
I, for one, thinks she’s pretty cool.
This is why Sydney Sweeney isn’t on Lemmy.
You are probably thinking of another talented blonde Australian actress.
That’s esteemed Academy Award nominated character actress Margot Robbie to you!
I think this is a fake quote that somebody made up for an Internet comedy bit, since it seems unlikely for Hollywood actress Sydney Sweeney to have such uncharacteristically strong opinion on software version control, of all things.
Because she of all people would know that there isn’t anything wrong with using git merge
, and it ultimately comes down to personal preference to what you are used to.
“GNU is Not Unix Image Manipulation Program Tool Kit” is still a better name for GTK than “GIMP ToolKit”.
It’s a name that will definitely raise some eyebrows in the less technically inclined circles. (and maybe a few “Pulp Fiction” references about “bring out the gimp”)
Speak for yourself, I first got on Lemmy to promote a movie, and the next thing I know, I was using Arch (BTW) and moderating an Android community.
I’m still not quite sure how that happened. This place.
Word of mouth. Friends. Internet.
Speaking of which, have you seen Barbie yet? I heard it’s pretty good.
In general, drunk me is the last person I would ever trust with literally anything.
It’s like waking up in the morning and reading your own drunk text messages.
If they only appreciate me enough to hand me my Oscar this year…
Instagram had slowly morphed from a website to share artsy filtered cell photos to an advertisement platform, where people are turning themselves into characters living the perfectly imperfect life on social media, in an attempt to turn themselves into living advertisements, to buy and sell products, Every photo (especially the natural looking ones) is carefully shot, curated and edited by a team to imitate authenticity, no different than shooting a movie or a TV show.
So then, what happens if that role of a living advertisment can automated by machines, equally as heartless and unrealistic as these performance of perfect daily lives on Instagram? Why go through the efforts, the hours and manpower, to conduct the photoshoots and Photoshops for that one perfectly imperfect targeted post, when anyone with a modern GPU can effortlessly make thousands of machine generated pictures with way less work in the same timeframe?
Why should the role of “social media influencer” even exist then?
I’ve been unhappy about the state of social media for a long time now. But as it appears, the role of the social media influencer, as the lowest common denominator of photography, will be the first to be rendered redundant by AI automation, which brings me hope that in time, social media can be brought back to what originally was: a place for people to talk to people.
Especially when your identity on Signal is STILL only tied to a phone number, instead of a username, and there is nothing less private than actually giving out your real phone number.
Absolutely baffling.
It’s always the one you least suspect, like disguising yourself as an impersonation of yourself.
Academy Award nominated character actress Margot Robbie can use any operating system at home as she please!
I think Facebook dating works better because you get a much more complete, natural profile of a person over a long period of time compared to Tinder and friends. Twitter… is not that.
(Watch my movies too, please😊)
And C‡ is once again not included. For shame.