Natanael
Cryptography nerd
Fediverse accounts;
Natanael@slrpnk.net (main)
Natanael@infosec.pub
Natanael@lemmy.zip
Lemmy moderation account: @TrustedThirdParty@infosec.pub - !crypto@infosec.pub
@Natanael_L@mastodon.social
Bluesky: natanael.bsky.social
- 0 Posts
- 148 Comments
The only viable competition to LIDAR is structured light (see Leap Motion, there’s equivalent sensors for cars), which uses an IR source with patterned light and multiple high frame rate cameras to calculate depth from the reflections. In theory light field photography with special lenses is possible too, but far more computationally heavy for real-time use IIRC
There’s some safety issues with LIDAR at close range (it’s a laser! it can damage cameras, etc), which is basically the main reason to not use it. But Tesla are dumb enough to try to replace them with cameras alone, and not even using proper multi-camera techniques to calculate depth
The judge explicitly did not allow piracy here. Only legally acquired media can be used for training.
This case didn’t cover the copyright status of outputs. The ruling so far is just about the process of training itself.
IMHO the generative ML companies should be required to build a process tracking the influence of distinct samples on the outputs, and inform users of potential licensing status
Division of liability / licensing responsibility should depend on who contributes what to the prompt / generation. The less it takes for the user to trigger the model to generate an output clearly derived from a protected work, the more liability lies on the model operator. If the user couldn’t have known, they shouldn’t be liable. If the user deliberately used jailbreaks, etc, the user is clearly liable.
But you get a weird edge case when users unknowingly copy prompts containing jailbreaks, though
The ruling explicitly does not allow pirating. It only lets you run ML training on legally acquired media.
They still haven’t ruled on copyright infringement from pirating the media used to train, and they haven’t ruled on copyright status of outputs (what it takes to be considered transformative).
This is judge Alsup, same guy who ruled in Oracle vs Google
I run a cryptography forum
Encryption doesn’t hide data sizes unless you take extra steps
It’s called traffic analysis
Timing of messages. They can’t tell what you send, but can tell when
Or they’re trying to figure out who’s trying to stay connected with who
Consider getting VoIP phone numbers from a jurisdiction that’s much less hostile, so you have another number available to use
“freeing up space on the user’s device”
Telegram also don’t have E2E encryption on groups
Do you think a device with regulation circuits is more likely to be overloaded and start fires…?
The infinitely easier solution is to let the car charger know how much power is available to draw.
More like shit creek village
And many of the most typical matching patterns are psychologically harmful
Besides the general security risk of they run trojaned clients, if they run it in the office they’re spending the company’s electricity
It’s called incident response
Federated stuff like lemmy really ends to with a much wider range of mods / admins. There’s still a lot variation between mod teams on reddit too, but there’s a lot more similarities there between the biggest subreddits (especially because of “power mods”, and more overlap in userbase & culture).
Tldr expect weirder removal reasons here. And check where stuff is hosted when posting.
Cars use stronger LIDAR lasers than the phones. The bigger range and faster response time requires it.