Melllvar

A standard reference model in 3d modeling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utah_teapot

From a national security standpoint of the government, it absolutely does matter who has the data.

You can collect unemployment after quitting if you have a good cause for quitting.

Looks like compatibility hacks for various websites.

Interventions - are deeper modifications to make sites compatible. Firefox may modify certain code used on these sites to enforce compatibility. Each compatibility modification links to the bug on Bugzilla@Mozilla; click on the link to look up information about the underlying issue.

User Agent Override - change the user agent of Firefox when connections to certain sites are made.

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Compatibility/UA_Override_&_Interventions_Testing

If social media companies exist to collect massive troves of personal info from users–and they do–then there is a valid national security concern over social media controlled by an adversary. This is distinct from the individual privacy concerns towards domestically-controlled social media.

No it’s not. There’s no bail, for example, and no plea bargaining in civil cases; jail time isn’t on the table, the district attorney isn’t involved, the standard of evidence is lower, and the rules of procedure are different.

First comes the discovery phase where both sides exchange evidence and the court settles any evidentiary questions. This phase can frequently take longer than the trial itself.

This is a civil case.

Lisa needs braces!

Ublock origin, Sponsor block, and NoScript

35

https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/election-certification-under-threat/

I’m not upgrading because I don’t trust Windows 11. Not that 10 has my confidence, of course, but 11 seems worse.

The value of the DNS is that we all use the same one. You can declare independence, but you’d lose out on that value.

💩

Point of order: the Constitution doesn’t set the number of justices, it gives that power to Congress.

That doesn’t seem like a reasonable or well thought-out idea.

What do you suppose the president has the power to do in this case?

The chronically homeless, the ones that are hardest to get off the street, are difficult to house for reasons besides availability or cost, though.

https://www.code.gov/

I’m curious what the federal government can actually do in this situation. Most private leases are contracts under state law, not federal law.