I feel like you’re vastly underestimating the number of flurries on the fediverse.

Steps to Reproduce:

1.Go near this fucking shit editor.

2.Commit the deadly sin of touching the source control options.

🤣

The issue is that they’re neglecting their core apps in favor of expanding their portfolio. There’s nothing wrong with creating these apps, but it should not be done until the core apps are industry leading and extremely refined.

The developers they used to create this wallet could have been used to fix protonmail bugs, or to bring protonvpn on Linux up to snuff. There’s still no first party CLI for Linux boxes, for example.

That’s why I’m here

Agreed, really hoping they stick to refocusing on the browser.

I agree, just the linguistics are interesting.

I find it interesting that the relabeling of CP to CSAM weakens their argument here. “CP generated by AI is still CP” makes sense, but if there’s no abusee, it’s just CSM. Makes me wonder if they would have not rebranded if they knew about the proliferation of AI pornography.

True, it’ll get you, what, fries and half a drink?

$30 in groceries won’t get you very far :(

That was the joke

Reported, rule 5

I have not been paying attention to threads and so I gave it a quick google. It seems that threads is doing just fine, with 130 million monthly users now.

Where should I be looking for the grisly stats?

ISPs in the US are notorious for getting public funds for services that they never provide, so I wouldn’t be too concerned about that.

I will archive you!

Since myself and others had no issues with your float needle example, mind sharing what you searched for, and what Google returned?

Errrm,

Ma’am*

Sorry you just have a very raspy voice.

You, sir, are a genius

Tomato, tomato translates hilariously poorly in text, I’m dying

I’m not really following you but I think we might be on similar paths. I’m just shooting in absolute darkness so don’t hold much weight to my guess.

What makes transformers brilliant is the attention mechanism. That is brilliant in turn because it’s dynamic, depending on your query (also some other stuff). This allows the transformer to be able to distinguish between bat and bat, the animal and the stick.

You know what I bet they didn’t do in testing or training? A nonsensical query that contains thousands of one word, repeating.

So my guess is simply that this query took the model so far out of its training space that the model weights have no ability to control the output in a reasonable way.

As for why it would output training data and not random nonsense? That’s a weak point in my understanding and I can only say “luck,” which is, of course, a way of saying I have no clue.

I would absolutely believe it, makes a lot of sense.