I went wild and started using it for servers about 5 years ago and I shit you not, it’s far more stable than I would have thought. I parse the blog for update notes if there’s any big changes to anything I’m using but given most stuff is offloaded to containers, I pretty much yolo a yay -Syu every week. Zero issues.
I had more issues with Debian and Ubuntu due to bugs in stale packages or weird default configs than I have running bleeding edge vanilla via Arch.
Run Docker containers on it, one for media server, one for DNS sinkhole etc.
Snap. I love the form factor and would have been interested in a Switch 2 but after all this bullshit with taking down emulators and trying to patent throwing balls, I’m going to be voting with my wallet and Nintendo have list for for the next generation or two. I’ll survive.
It’s a string, dawg. Just maintain a database of hash and resource location. Lookup hash, return location.
Limestone (thick bastard haha) but the inside is still stud walls, plaster board, etc. Quarry is nearby so it was practically a steal.
My house is made of limestone and is only a few years old…
Agreed. They’re also solving problems that may not even exist, building a tech stack that needs to be maintained in addition to the game itself and adding all the baggage of supporting users who have needs that aren’t catered for with that stack (for instance a specific Windows-only tool).
The game engine should abstract most of these problems away. The rest can be solved with standards like what linter/formatter for code, art asset formats and specs, etc.
Solve problems as they arise. Time is best spent writing the game.
Apple do have a history of putting “Ad” next to anything that is an advertisement so hopefully they continue with that design pattern.
AI is a magical black box that performs a bunch of actions to produce an output. We can’t trust what a developer says the black box does inside without it being completely open source (including weights).
This is a concept for a system where the actions performed can be proved to those who don’t have visibility inside the box to trust the box is doing what it is saying it’s doing.
An AI enemy that can prove it isn’t cheating by providing proof of the actions it took. In theory.
Zero Knowledge Proofs make a lot of sense for cryptography but in a more abstracted sense like this, it still relies on a lot of trust that the implementation generates proofs for all actions.
Whenever I see Web3, I personally lose any faith in whatever is being presented or proposed. To me, blockchain is an impressive solution to no real problem (except perhaps border control / customs).
Does this break tools that expand these URLs without visiting them?
If so, they’ve just made themselves incredibly attractive to malicious actors since determining what is behind the URL will be harder to do safely and quickly for security controls.
I’m in the UK. Just says Gulf of Mexico for me, even when I select it.
Still says Gulf of Mexico to me. Is the change just for American users then?
How do you have waterfall without known requirements? What does waterfall have to do with anticipating work?
Can you elaborate in detail what the problem is? It’s not apparent from what you’ve detailed so far.