Isn’t new York flooded right now?

Because it’s the country the company is based in.

Can you be more specific? I’d like to know what it’s missing.

It’s basically a book you can talk to. A book can contain incredibly knowledge, but it’s a preserve artifact of intelligence, not intelligence.

Great way to lose all the best people at your company in a totally uncontrolled manner.

And he’s blaming the anti defamation league…

Shouldn’t that already be covered under revenge porn laws? At least the distribution side of it.

Calling them psychologists is giving them too much credit, but you’re right that the companies trying to trick them are putting tons of resources into it.

Most mushrooms won’t kill you

That’s not very reassuring

Even for indexes I do index or something more specific for what it’s indexing. Any simple iteration I just do map or each so the only time I ever need to actually index things is for more complex scenarios in which case it’s worth it to have better names. Also with modem IDEs, auto complete is really good so you don’t need to write a full variable name more than once.

So ignore all the things he says should be done beyond deplatforming and just get angry about made up assumptions that you extrapolated off your interpretation of tone? Get outta here

Most of his suggestions are just advocating for greater transparency. What’s the weird part?

This ruling seems to be really badly misinterpreted. The case wasn’t for people using ai tools to create works but from a computer scientist who created a completely autonomous tool and was trying to co-copyright the works with the tool. Copyright needs human involvement, how much human involvement is still not hard law, but if you integrate the output of an AI and integrate it into a larger work that is very much covered.

Sure, in this case it was rich idiots spending millions, they’re only upset that they missed the opportunity to pawn it off to another idiot first

Even still, they take 30% of a studio’s revenue which is a ridiculous amount that’s only possible through a near monopoly

HP has been shit for decades now, it’s not some techie secret. Companies used to live and die by their reputation. What happened?

They’re all con artists. The people buying them were trying to scam someone else.

No, it’s not a pyramid scheme, it’s not a ponzi scheme, it’s just a good old fashioned investment scheme.

The benefit is that you could have a distributed marketplace. Instead of having monopolies like steam where one company accumulates a bunch of power they can abuse you could have multiple small companies band together to support a common standard of ownership so you could buy from any company and all the companies supporting the standard would respect it. You could also tie it to a legal contract so it’s actually enforceable.

Of course you could just do that with an centralized standard that’s backed by multiple companies too.

NFT buyers were also scammers since their intention was to sell it off to the next patsy