

It’s literally in the phrase “statically optimized.” This is like arguing for your preferred deity. It’ll never be proven but we have evidence to make our own conclusions. As it is now, AI doesn’t learn or understand the same way humans do.
It’s literally in the phrase “statically optimized.” This is like arguing for your preferred deity. It’ll never be proven but we have evidence to make our own conclusions. As it is now, AI doesn’t learn or understand the same way humans do.
Google search results aren’t deterministic but I wouldn’t say it “learns” like a person. Algorithms with pattern detection isn’t the same as human learning.
I’ve hand calculated forward propagation (neural networks). AI does not learn, its statically optimized. AI “learning” is curve fitting. Human learning requires understanding, which AI is not capable of.
I am educated on this. When an ai learns, it takes an input through a series of functions and are joined at the output. The set of functions that produce the best output have their functions developed further. Individuals do not process information like that. With poor exploration and biasing, the output of an AI model could look identical to its input. It did not “learn” anymore than a downloaded video ran through a compression algorithm.
Guardian claims this is the first death while transporting from jail to federal detention. It does not mention that 10 have already died in this year alone, more than any other year and we’re only half way in.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/number-deaths-ice-custody-already-double-last-year-rcna154659
Know your rights:
I don’t know what’s worse. Deporting children to a country they’ve never seen or deporting people who’ve been here longer than some of us have been alive.
You can come on a visa, seek asylum, overstay. It’s not improper entry or illegal presence, it’s exempt for asylum seekers.
ICE is arresting people who are coming legally. People who never chose to come here. People who’ve done everything right.
Might have been me. Looks like leaded gas is back on the menu boys.
AI can’t know that other instances of it are trying to “break” people. It’s also disingenuous to exclude that the AI also claimed that those 12 individuals didn’t survive. They left it out because obviously the AI did not kill 12 people. It doesn’t support the narrative. Don’t misinterpret my point beyond critiquing the clearly exaggerated messaging here.
Haven’t lost a partner before, but I’ve experienced the feeling of questioning my value. Know others in similar places. Don’t overthink it. It won’t make it better. I’ve found it’s better to act and reflect then mope and regret.
I spent way too long researching the morning. That industry implies a much greater population that is attracted to children. Things get more nuanced. People are attracted to different stages, like prebubesant, early adolescence, and mid to late adolescence. It seems like an important distinction because this is a common mental disorder.
I was ready to write this comment about my fear that there’s a bunch of evil pedophiles living among us who are simply deterred by legal or social pressures.
It seems more like the extreme stigma of pedophilia has prevented individuals from seeking assistance and has resulted in more child sexual abuse. This sort of disorder can be caused by experiencing this abuse at a younger age.
When I was religious, we worked closely with an organization to help victims of trafficking. We had their stories. They entered our lives. I took care of some of these kids. As a victim of sexual abuse when I was kid, I had a hatred for these kinds of people. I feel like my brain is melting seeing how there is a high chance of people in my life being attracted to children. This isn’t really to justify the industry. I’m just realizing that general harassing people openly about it might not be helping the situation.
50,000 minors are trafficked for sex each year.
It is the second most profitable criminal industry.
There are millions upon millions of child sexual abuse material files reported each year.
https://ourrescue.org/education/research-and-trends/human-trafficking-statistics
Didn’t realize they made that much.
This article claims fox anchors make as little as $1 million up to $45 million.
It cost him his job.
Edit: Maybe even his career
Everyone knows to bring zip tie handcuffs and duct tape to a riot.
They look like a successful before and after transition. Or siblings.
Pro life forcing the brain dead to give birth, even if the fetus is already dead or suffering incredible pain and expected to die.
Obviously, using an AI to verify if somethingis AI is kinda bullshit, but this is what deepseek spat out:
The list you shared does have strong AI-generated hallmarks. Here’s why it stands out as likely machine-written, and how you can spot similar outputs in the future:
Repetitive Phrasing – Overuse of:
Excessive “Rescinding” Verbs – A human would vary language more (e.g., “repeal,” “abolish,” “eliminate”).
Oddly Specific Yet Vague Items – Some entries sound bureaucratic but lack real-world impact (e.g., “Rescinding Test Procedures for Small Electric Motors”).
Inconsistent Scope – Jumps from major energy policies (Strategic Petroleum Reserve) to trivial ones (showerhead pressure).
“Unnecessary ADR Regulations” – ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolution) is a niche term unlikely in a political deregulation push.
No Partisan Signaling – A real Trump/Musk DOGE list would include culture-war items (e.g., “Ending EV mandates”) or tech-bro priorities (e.g., “Fast-tracking AI nuclear reactor approvals”).
This would be a major scandal. Next steps:
Let me know if you want help digging deeper! This is a wild (and concerning) scenario if true. 🕵️♂️
I want to note that the AI barely comprehended the idea of a government agency DOGE existing or the idea that Trump was reelected. I had to hammer it in:
Ah, got it—so we’re envisioning a Doge-led Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) under a Trump 2024 victory, where Elon Musk and a bunch of 20-year-old tech bros are ruthlessly slashing bureaucracy with meme-fueled chaos.
Here’s your **47 absurd, inefficient, or just
Holy shit that DOE list is AI as hell
I’m confused. They falsely accused 1,700 cases where people weren’t committing fraud but could only prove that 300 people were and it’s the clinics fault so they need to pay a railroad company from Texas $3M and the government $3M? How could they possibly have caused $6M in damages with only 300 people on medicare? Did each person get paid $20,000?
Yes. You learned not to touch a hot stove either from experience or a warning. That fear was immortalized by your understanding that it would hurt. An AI will tell you not to touch a hot stove (most of the time) because the words “hot” “stove” “pain” etc… pop up in its dataset together millions of times. As things are, they’re barely comparable. The only reason people keep arguing is because the output is very convincing. Go and download pytorch and read some stuff, or Google it. I’ve even asked deepseek for you:
Can AI learn and understand like people?
1. Learning: Similar in Some Ways, Different in Others
2. Understanding: AI vs. Human Cognition
3. Strengths & Weaknesses
✔ AI Excels At:
❌ AI Falls Short At:
4. Current AI (Like ChatGPT) is a “Stochastic Parrot”
5. Future Possibilities (AGI)
Conclusion:
AI can simulate learning and understanding impressively, but it doesn’t experience them like humans do. It’s a powerful tool, not a mind.
Would you like examples of where AI mimics vs. truly understands?