Seriously! There’s no network, NAT, port forwarding, network isolation - hell, not even any iptables rules in any of these images. This meme makes no fucking sense.

https://docs.python.org/3/library/concurrent.futures.html#concurrent.futures.ProcessPoolExecutor

One of my favorite documentaries.

1. emacs

2. emacs

3. emacs

4. emacs

5. emacs

6. emacs

7. emacs

8. emacs

9. vim

10. emacs

11. emacs

12. emacs

13. emacs

14. emacs

15. emacs

This was the only bit of leverage democrats had, the future of US democracy now lies with the judiciary, any future elections will be a farce.

Harris fucked us with Trump, and now she’s trying to fuck us again by losing to another maga retard.

Harris, you are a fucking loser, we don’t want you.

In the future, when some fascist militia member has you on your knees in front of a ditch, you’ll be able to reflect back on this moment and revel in your moral superiority.

🏅

This is why magats are winning the information wars. It’s a post truth world friend, but when it’s your turn to get on the train you can take solace in the fact that you were right.

The web is a total shit show, but if you can provide a single example of an established website which will cause a dev any real grief because you enter [object Object] into a form I’ll send you $100.00.

Most likely no one is bothered at all because input is already validated and OP is just a moron.

I think a lot of comments here miss the mark, it’s not really just about stating the gov does not use SQL or speculation regarding keys.

Deduplication is generally part of a compression strategy and has nothing to do with SQL. If we’re being generous he may have been talking about normalization, but no one I have ever met has confused the two terms (they are distinctly different from an engineering perspective).

There are degrees of normalization too, so it may make total sense to normalize 3NF (third normal form) rather than say 6NF depending on the data.

$ man ascii | awk '/X$/ {print $7}'
88

I’m sure he has an alternative, like tattooing it on the forearms of ‘undesirables’.

No offense, but reading through the comments it’s apparent you’re not very familiar with systems programming nor linux development. This is a common problem with vocal ‘rustaceans’, rust is their hammer regardless of the domain.

Although considering rust is prudent, there are still a ton of advantages to using C for systems programming. It is not a binary choice, there are pros and cons, and every project should choose what aligns with their priorities.

No one has ever stated that linux will be in the kernel. It was ‘go ahead and give it a shot’, which includes convincing maintainers to accept your patches. Linus has delegated trust to subsystems maintainers and an established process.

Hellwig could have been more tactful, but like it or not, arguments against a cross-language codebase have merit. Framing it as a ‘clear confession of sabotage of the r4l project’, attempting to weaponize the CoC, and trying to drum up an army via social media was all out of line.

Success was never a given, if they want r4l to succeed then they have to get patches approved and crying wolf ain’t gonna cut it.

Emacs client library and interface for Lemmy instances.

https://codeberg.org/martianh/lem.el

I understand you’re emotional and frustrated (as are other parties), but your framing here is disingenuous. No one is ‘openly admitting to attempting to sabotage the entire Rust for Linux project’. You are encountering one of the known challenges of the project, and arguments against a cross-language codebase have merit. Existing maintainers have every right to push back where they see fit, as you have every right to advocate.

I’d be more sympathetic, but attempting to weaponize the CoC here really reflects poorly on you. You should focus on solving the problem, you might not succeed, but trying to drum up an army rather than doing the work casts you unfavorably IMO.

Sounds like you’re just still in the same boat as op.

alias upgrayedd=' && pacman/paru ...'

OR

upgrayedd() {
    <pre>        
    pacman/paru "$1"
    
}</pre>

focused on stability and is not as up-to-date as other distros

This community really should stop FUD peddling about debian.

stable is not the only debian release, and there are multiple ways to pull newer package versions. For instance, anyone who can read a manual can run a cutting edge rolling release debian box with this simple incantation:

sudo sed -i 's/bookworm/sid/g' /etc/apt/sources.list

stable is their default, but debian can be just as “up-to-date” as you want it to be.

Alta Mexico

Baja Mexico