Optics of cutting the programs aside, it’s criminal that beneficial programs like these don’t get re-authorized.
Is it The Onion? Or Not the Onion?
Yes
I only use Lemmy, so… Lemmy.
Not necessarily “out of sand”. IP is basically putting a price tag on a person for them to say “Yes, I consent”. In other words, technofeudalism.
Maybe, part of your job is to not touch anything in a random day and observe what happens when something breaks. That way, you can document what’s not being fixed so that your team is more prepared when you’re actually not there.
Crowd Strike’s Final Fantasy
Until we meet again, Ilmen-mariner
Except that they’ll put it in more… eloquent language. 😅
The elves did not pay their license to exist in Middle-Earth. And so their opacity decreased until their bodies completely fade away.
The hyperbole is the point. They’re explaining that such a thing is theoretically possible.
Looks more like a legislative skill issue than a judicial one to me. I don’t know what is expected of the judges aside from interpreting the law.
I’m very wary of the measures that could potentially pass if the some of the anti-AI art people get their way. I know how messy and difficult putting fair-use material in YouTube can be. There would be more of that in more platforms.
I agree unregulated AI is problematic. At the same time, I’m cynical on what the actual measures would look like.
The future is regarded in a low light.
I get that using and promoting labels for your group promote solidarity. It can also cause division simply because when you call yourself “X”, it’s inevitable that people would form opinions and at worst prejudices on what is “not X”.
My point? Similar policies may result in different outcomes.
This measure in a vacuum is not inherently bad, though it is authoritarian and, yes, contrary to a Republican’s (theoretical) advocacy to small government. Rwanda also removed legal distinctions between Tutsi and Hutu, but it was done after and because of the genocide.
So true. At the same time, this happens because a lot of hiring managers don’t know intimately what the job actually does, so they resort to cookie-cutter interview techniques.