Better remove it.

Why would he not pay somebody to play?

The bigger story is:

Who are those 343,011 idiots?

Yes, let AI execute all business processes as designed.

Reposting my question from the other post:

Can lemmy become the place on the internet to discover the best accounts on X and thus become popular?

When lemmy becomes popular, how will we make the solid information stand out and not drown in disinformation ourselves?

Can we pull off an elite move and use the war to make lemmy popular right now by being the place on the internet that has the best collection of relevant and trustworthy X accounts?

As if slavery is a new concept and nobody was warned about huge conglomerates in every science fiction movie.

That’s the problem if you want professional online services. Being the product should be the weird option.

If you like conspiracies you could ask yourself how much work on Firefox could have been done if Mozilla had invested their ad billions globally.

Musk wants to create a super app like WeChat. He needs credit cards first. He is turning Twitter into his old X.

It’s the Apple app ecosystem without people willing to hand over credit card information for iTunes music. Apple won the mobile phone market because they had customers willing to pay for apps.

You look at it backwards. It’s ‘watch ads to avoid paying’.

Paying is the default way to buy something.

Does anybody use ACL without regretting it?

That doesn’t sound crass enough to grasp the full extend of the development. AI will take all of the energy. E v e r y t h I n g.

There won’t be a planet once there is a Dyson sphere. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyson_sphere

Why? If they don’t employ other drivers and every driver is a member, everything should be fine.

They obviously lack a role model in their life. If there is a market for such an app, who has or is going to develop an app that fills that gap and offers the knowledge sincerely that they are missing, without the abusive parts?

Where is the fascism? Should I ignore the reasons for homelessness and pretend that it is a normal state of life? Have I missed the memo where people are voluntarily homeless?

So that’s it.

Here, you are willing to suggest death to resolve conflicts.

There is also this reference:

A Two hustlegrind comment chains comment where you, as I interpret it, reject competition as a tool to prevent market dominating rent seeking.

The upvotes reaffirm you.

From my perspective that’s fundamentally wrong. You are either able to turn everybody into a friend and thus don’t need conflicts, or you manage conflicts by distributing power.

If I don’t see the light and you know how to turn the world into a better place, good luck for your approach.

Prepare another NO U answer. That comment is bullshit unless the Great Egress has actual meaning. In that case, please elaborate. Otherwise try again. How do you want to resolve the surveillance state?

I would like to know how you want to resolve the surveillance state.

Putting me into that clichee of a tech bro as if I don’t care about anything else, how is that not dehumanising?

There are plenty of open issues that you have chosen to ignore while you enjoyed dwelling in insults. I get the hang of it but let’s not pretend that’s me who is dehumanizing.