Stop whining.

Prove what? That you can’t cite a law?

You’re saying absolute goddamned nonsense.

If he’s always on top of things, why is he doing this now and not sooner?

No, wrong. Or else teachers would be able to make copies of textbooks, and they’re not.

Yeah, this is definitely wrong. Giving away something you don’t own is still illegal.

I’m aware of how you think it should work (Usenet, basically) but how does moderation actually work on Lemmy? Can someone be banned from a sublemmy on one instance and not banned from it on another?

I don’t want to share an instance with the nutballs on the tankie instance or the nutballs on the fascist instance.

Chromium browsers don’t allow extensions (uBlock Origin being the best) to block ads as effectively due to their implementation of Manifest V3. The Firefox implementation doesn’t share that limitation.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/12/chrome-users-beware-manifest-v3-deceitful-and-threatening

https://www.theverge.com/2023/1/17/23559234/firefox-manifest-v3-content-ad-blocker

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2022/05/18/manifest-v3-in-firefox-recap-next-steps/

Yes, there is a difference, but it’s minor and big stuff, like adblocking not working as well, are true of Chrome and Chromium.

Edge is Chrome.

Insurgencies work and has been proven time and time again. See: Iraq

The insurgents lost in Iraq. I know you stopped paying attention when FOX News moved on, but the Iraqi government won.

Yeah, I don’t trust TERF Island to do this right. They’ll ban Contrapoints long before they ban Rowling.

They’re completely meaningful and not at all patronizing. (Do you even know what that word means?)

Not wrong, in that the studies are valid, and completely relevant to your point.

Guns kill their owners far more often than they kill home invaders and other intruders.

According to EU rules, eventual video calls to emergency services would be obligated to have the video feature on both ends — the caller and the dispatcher.

“Obliged” means “required”

99% isn’t good enough for emergency services. Also, sometimes, video is too dangerous.

Doesn’t seem to be what the article says:

According to EU rules, eventual video calls to emergency services would be obligated to have the video feature on both ends — the caller and the dispatcher.

“Obliged” means “required”

According to EU rules, eventual video calls to emergency services would be obligated to have the video feature on both ends — the caller and the dispatcher.

“Obliged” means “required”

So people without video phones, or who can’t use video phones, can’t call emergency services.