LeoA to Linux@lemmy.ml • 11 months agoLXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical Employeeswww.phoronix.comexternal-linkmessage-square14arrow-up149arrow-down14cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.worldnews
arrow-up145arrow-down1external-linkLXD Maintainership Being Limited To Canonical Employeeswww.phoronix.comLeoA to Linux@lemmy.ml • 11 months agomessage-square14cross-posted to: linux@lemmy.worldnews
minus-square@Gargari@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglish13•11 months agoVery sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
minus-squarearouenelinkfedilink6•11 months ago@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
minus-square@oldfart@lemm.eelinkfedilink1•11 months agoIt’s packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there’s anything wrong with just using lxc)
Very sad. LXC/D is pretty good system level container, much safer/isolated than docker/podman and lighter than VMs
@Gargari @leo You can still use LXC without LXD. I never used lxd since it’s pretty much snap only.
It’s packaged in non-Ubuntu distros (not that there’s anything wrong with just using lxc)