Forty-eight Democrats joined Republicans in supporting legislation that aims to deport more migrants charged with nonviolent crimes, a first salvo in a broader crackdown.
Archived at https://archive.is/spHhp
Forty-eight Democrats joined Republicans in supporting legislation that aims to deport more migrants charged with nonviolent crimes, a first salvo in a broader crackdown.
Archived at https://archive.is/spHhp
It’s a pretty hot potato word so I generally stay with the UN definition. As I said on another comment it can be bad, it can be a human rights violation and state oppression without being Genocide.
It’s a hot potato word only in the sense that people who support genocide really fucking hate it when what they do is called such. To those people I say their concerns are bullshit and they can stuff it. We are talking about a mass incarceration and deportation of a racial group for the purpose of the destruction of that culture from a country. We are talking genocide. Why do you want to let evil men define their deeds as anything else than the thing it is? Do you support them? Are you here to poison the well? Or are you just so caught up in trying to intellectualize a genocide you can’t see the bodies at your own god damn feet? Either way, stuff it.
Because there’s 65 million Hispanic citizens in the US and the only thing Trump has stated is he wants to deport immigrants who are here without documentation.
So yeah without actual evidence you don’t get the label.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-aims-end-birthright-citizenship-says-american-citizens-family-il-rcna183274
Go
https://www.aclu.org/trump-on-immigration
Fuck
https://unitedwedream.org/press/united-we-dream-responds-to-trumps-comments-on-daca/
Yourself.
Again.
It can be illegal, bad, no good, and horrible, without being Genocide.
Also, there isn’t any evidence he would make citizens a target. None of those articles actually presents evidence for that.
Removing temporary protections and continuing Biden’s arbitrary Asylum bans isn’t Genocide either.
That’s the entire sole point here.
By God the man is illiterate
There is a vast gulf between an advocate stating they believe he would do something and actual evidence that he would do something.
There is a vast gulf between a random “advocate” and a guy you have hired and given a position by which he is able to do the things he says he is going to do. Once again. I can’t tell if you are actually just not able to comprehend the very easily comprehendable information or if you are maliciously attempting to run propaganda. The fuck is wrong with you?