@CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agoDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.comexternal-linkmessage-square12fedilinkarrow-up145arrow-down116cross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
arrow-up129arrow-down1external-linkDeepSeek might not be as disruptive as claimed, firm reportedly has 50,000 Nvidia GPUs and spent $1.6 billion on buildoutswww.tomshardware.com@CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.worldEnglish • 2 months agomessage-square12fedilinkcross-posted to: news@lemmy.world
minus-square@CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish17•2 months agoHuh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
minus-square@fallowseed@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink8•2 months agodoesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
minus-square@CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglish7•2 months agoI guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.
minus-square@CameronDev@programming.devlinkfedilink7•2 months agoUnless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?
Huh, well imagine that. The truth is more complicated than the initial hype.
doesn’t that make their releasing it as open-source even more of a gift? :P
I guess. Although Meta does the same, and I’m not sure of the motivations.
Unless their goal was shorting the affected tech stocks. They were a financial firm originally right?