@abobla@lemm.ee to Linux@lemmy.ml • 2 years agoFedora threatened with legal action from OBS Studio due to their Flatpak packagingwww.gamingonlinux.comexternal-linkmessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1232arrow-down18cross-posted to: news
arrow-up1224arrow-down1external-linkFedora threatened with legal action from OBS Studio due to their Flatpak packagingwww.gamingonlinux.com@abobla@lemm.ee to Linux@lemmy.ml • 2 years agomessage-square47fedilinkcross-posted to: news
minus-square@tabular@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish5•edit-22 years agoIs there any merit to the claim OBS is using an end-of-life (EOL) runtime and that this is a very bad thing for security?
minus-square@Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilink3•2 years agoI think you might find this comment by one of the OBS upstream devs interesting: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/463#comment-955899
minus-square@commander@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 years ago Fedora’s opinion seems to be that upgrading is always the right choice, which we disagree with. Ugh, I’m glad people are willing to fight back against these kinds of assertions. Regardless of who is right, facilitating and encouraging this kind of discourse is how we end up with better software for everyone.
Is there any merit to the claim OBS is using an end-of-life (EOL) runtime and that this is a very bad thing for security?
I think you might find this comment by one of the OBS upstream devs interesting:
https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/463#comment-955899
thanks!
Ugh, I’m glad people are willing to fight back against these kinds of assertions.
Regardless of who is right, facilitating and encouraging this kind of discourse is how we end up with better software for everyone.