• zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    who even decides what’s “modern” anymore?

    can anyone, honestly, without reading the article (or guessing from the headline), tell me which of these is the "modern" design?

    screenshot of the nautilus file manager in light mode screenshot of the nautilus file manager in light mode

    edit: people are getting confused by the fact that one is tree view, not icons view so i changed the image. old image here

        • TOR-anon1
          link
          fedilink
          01 year ago

          Notice Min/Max buttons missing from window bar?

          That’s the default.

          • True Blue
            link
            fedilink
            171 year ago

            The idea is that you’re not supposed to minimize windows at all under Gnome’s workflow, and you maximize by double-clicking the headerbar to save space. You get used to it.

            • @apprehensively_human@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              141 year ago

              It’s a bit weird to me how, on a post regarding a GNOME update, people feel the need to come out of the woodwork to explain how they prefer to use Plasma or any other DE or WM.

              This is Linux, you can use whatever you feel like using. Let people be happy with what they’re happy with.

          • @jbk@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            21 year ago

            tbh not the best choice but that’s just their design language I guess. what I was asking about tho was this post’s redesign specifically

      • @Petter1@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        01 year ago

        I think “modern” can be interpreted as nice and clean UI which is beautiful to watch and only the absolutely most important stuff is shown and the rest is hidden. So, like apple design approaches, I guess. Say form over function. Microsoft tends to go that route as well. Luckily for user who like function over form, there are different flavors of Linux.

    • @curioushom@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      201 year ago

      Clearly the dark mode is the modern one! Jokes aside, I just realized that there THREE menu options on that toolbar: hamburger, kebab, and waffle! I realize they do different things, but no wonder people are confused by and scared of computers. Also, now I’m hungry!

      • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
        link
        fedilink
        English
        41 year ago

        as someone who’s not scared of computers, i have no idea what they do. i assume the right one is icons/list/compact[1] not a waffle menu, but the hamburger and kebab? i have no clue


        1. though why it’s showing list when the current view is icons, i don’t know either ↩︎

          • @aka_oscar@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            31 year ago

            It has the same options as right clicking on an empty space in a directory. Stuff like Create a new folder, Create a new file, that sort of thing. “Actions you might wanna make on this directory”. When you start searching, there is another button that appears and that one is the one that let you filter search options

            I dont see the usefulness of that button tbh. Its like it assumes good ol right click isnt discoverable on its own. Idk anyond who has a mouse and hasnt pressed right click ever.

          • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 year ago

            maybe; but if the location of menu buttons hints at their use then the hamburger should collapse the side drawer like the one on e.g. youtube, but i doubt it does

    • @HouseWolf@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      151 year ago

      Corpo’s and social media “designers” who would throw out their own mother because she’s “outdated”

      Honestly as someone who doesn’t use Gnome… I can’t really tell much of a difference, Seems like a strange thing to build hype over.

    • @InFerNo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      71 year ago

      The first one doesn’t waste space in the title bar by expanding the locator and navigator buttons there.

    • @pH3ra@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      7
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s just my opinion (since it’s not in the article) but a thing that makes Gnome and Libadwaita a “modern design” is the fact that the production behind it tries to bridge the gap between a “mouse and keyboard” and a “touch screen” workflow.
      None of the other DEs come even close to Gnome when used on a tablet

      • @thepoaster@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        21 year ago

        Agreed, I’m not an expert, kind of new to linux, but I could see being very comfortable on a Gnome based tablet.

      • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        meh, subjectively i find that creates a “worst of both worlds” situation. but this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

        • @pH3ra@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

          yeah sorry, I should have been more specific with my answer: features like this are supposed to help you in a touch screen situation or in general with smaller screens.
          When the window is resized under a certain size, the left panel becomes hidden and with it part of the top bar, to make it less cluttered and confusing.

          • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            but …surely you could just do the same thing with the old design? artist’s rendition:

            in fact, now i look at it, it makes them look even more similar once i collapse the sidebar

            • @pH3ra@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              11 year ago

              The difference is minimal, in the newer version you have 1 less element when the sidebar is collapsed (the hamburger menu).
              Generally speaking Gnome 44 is already well optimized, 45 is going to be a more “tweaks and small improvements” kind of update rather than a big design changes

    • @Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      51 year ago

      Petition to force anyone talking about software to use “trendy” or “fashionable” instead of “modern”.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 year ago

        List/grid view are in the top right. This is an unfair comparison having one in list and one in grid, when they both clearly have a button (in the same location even) to switch modes.

        Dark is clearly the modern one though, but presumably you can switch between dark and light.

        • I was referring to the unnecessary header text on the sidebar, squeezing everything else up there. I am aware there are different display modes lol

    • @flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      31 year ago

      It’d be kinda nice if they made these kinds of changes options rather than just deciding this is best

      Could honestly take it or leave it, doesn’t really add anything

      • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 year ago

        i’m not even sure it’s worth having an option. i don’t think i’d even have noticed a difference, apart from the menu button being in a slightly different place to every other gnome app. it’s fine; but it wasn’t worth the development time

        • sab
          link
          fedilink
          15
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The last thing I want is an option for this. My gosh, imagine the amount of options you would end up with if every single design choice was turned into an option. Who in the world would like that many options.

          I’m happy to just have a design team work on whatever they think looks better and works best for the user experience, and implement it after some rounds of public review and testing. This looks neat enough to me - slightly less cluttered than what my current Nautilus window looks like while maintaining the same functionality.

          • @s20@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            121 year ago

            Who in the world would like that many options.

            KDE fans?

            Awww, Plasma fans, you know I’m playin’.

              • @s20@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                91 year ago

                Seriously, I envy you guys. Every time I try to use Plasma, I end up spending all my time tweaking the desktop, and by the time I’m done, I realize I’ve just recreated the Gnome workflow…

                • @flashgnash@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  21 year ago

                  I tried KDE, it’s cool but I get the same thing of trying to recreate gnome/pantheon

                  It kinda sucks in GNOME when there’s just one thing you would like to change though

                  Have been trying to get a tiling window manager on GNOME but all the gnome extensions that do it kinda suck

                  • @s20@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    21 year ago

                    I mean, almost. I can pull it off on my desktop, but I can’t get the touchpad/touchscreen gestures to work right on my laptop.

                    Kinda looking forward to Plasma 6 to play around with, though. Might even be enough to get me to switch for a while!

                • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  every time i try to use gnome, i end up spending all my time going “dammit, where are all the bleeding features

                  (also the lack of fitts’ law adherence due to that pointless bar at the top)

                  • @s20@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I had to look up Fitts’s law, and I’m not sure I get it. Could you explain what you mean?

                    ETA: I kinda feel like mine was about KDE not being a fit for me personally, and yours was a slam on Gnome rather than a statement of personal preference.

      • @0000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        51 year ago

        Well I just switched to KDE Plasma last week and I’m pleasantly surprised just how many things are configurable via a menu and how well it runs on Wayland With a Nvidia GPU.

        I used to despise KDE Neon, and used Gnome for a bit, but I don’t think I can go back anymore until their design philosophy changes again.

        • @flashgnash@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          11 year ago

          Problem for me is KDE is dependant on configuration to get it to look nice, GNOME looks nice and works well out of the box but sucks if you want to do anything ontop of that base

    • @mtchristo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      01 year ago

      Honestly, I haven’t yet seen the article, the light theme one is probably newer because of tabs.

      Anyways both look like an android app, I know most will hate reading this but Windows Explorer rules.

      • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼
        link
        fedilink
        English
        01 year ago

        nah, i agree with you. win explorer with qttabbar, tortoisegit, and some tweaks from winaerotweaker

        dolphin is pretty good though and it has some features that explorer doesn’t, like a terminal pane